Management of a Fractured Multiunit Maxillary Implant‐Supported Fixed Prosthesis with Stripped Abutment Screws Using a Hybrid Cement‐Retained and Screw‐Retained Design: A 5‐Year Follow‐Up Clinical Report

Amri, Mohammad D. Al

doi:10.1111/jopr.12433

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(42 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies suggests the method used for implant prosthesis retention (cement or screw‐retained restorations) is associated with the initiation and progression of peri‐implant soft tissue inflammation and CBL. Stagnation of residual cement in the peri‐implant tissues after prosthesis fixation can incite soft tissue inflammation and CBL . In this regard, excess cement at the time of prosthesis loading needs to be removed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies 26,27 suggests the method used for implant prosthesis retention (cement or screw-retained restorations) is associated with the initiation and progression of peri-implant soft tissue inflammation and CBL.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stagnation of residual cement in the peri-implant tissues after prosthesis fixation can incite soft tissue inflammation and CBL. 26,27 In this regard, excess cement at the time of prosthesis loading needs to be removed. In Systemic diseases such as AIDS and poorly-controlled DM are prospect of peri-implant diseases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Soft tissue status and crestal bone loss around conventionally‐loaded dental implants placed in cigarette‐ and waterpipe (narghile) smokers: 8‐years' follow‐up results

AlAhmari

Javed

Ahmed³

et al. 2019

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background We hypothesized that crestal bone loss (CBL) and peri‐implant soft tissue inflammation are increased when conventionally‐loaded dental implants are placed in cigarette and waterpipe smokers compared to nonsmokers. Purpose The present 8‐years' follow‐up retrospective clinical study evaluated the stability of the conventionally‐loaded dental implants placed in cigarette‐ and waterpipe (narghile) smoking and nonsmoking population group. Materials and Methods Self‐reported cigarette‐smokers, waterpipe users along with never‐smokers have been included. Data pertaining to gender, age, duration and frequency of cigarette‐smoking, and usage of waterpipe were collected using a preformed questionnaire. Probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and peri‐implant plaque index (PI) were recorded measuring mesial and distal CBL on digital bitewing radiographs. Study power estimated with group comparisons performed using the Kruskal‐Wallis and Bonferroni post‐hoc adjustment tests. Statistically significant P‐values of less than 0.05 were considered. Results Forty‐one cigarette‐smokers, forty waterpipe‐users, and forty‐two never‐smokers with mean ages of 44.5 ± 4.3, 41.2 ± 4.7, 43.3 ± 2.8 years, respectively, were included. The mean duration of smoking habit and duration of each session of cigarette‐smoking was 5.5 ± 0.3 years and 7.7 ± 1.2 minutes, respectively. The mean period of waterpipe use and time of each session of was 10.6 ± 0.8 years and 20.2 ± 3.1 minutes, respectively. Among cigarette‐smokers, waterpipe‐users and never‐smokers, the implants had been in function for 8.5 ± 0.3, 8.6 ± 0.3, and 8.5 ± 0.5 years, respectively. PD, CBL, and peri‐implant PI were positively more among cigarette and waterpipe smoking users (P < 0.05) than with never‐smokers. Peri‐implant bleeding on probing was significant among never‐smokers (P < 0.05) compared to waterpipe‐users and cigarette‐smokers. There was no difference in Peri‐implant PI, PD, and CBL in cigarette‐smokers and waterpipe‐users. Conclusions Cigarette‐smokers and waterpipe users are vulnerable to peri‐implant soft tissue inflammation and CBL than never‐smokers. There is no variation in the severity of peri‐implant soft tissue inflammation and CBL in waterpipe and cigarette users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Soft tissue status and crestal bone loss around conventionally‐loaded dental implants placed in cigarette‐ and waterpipe (narghile) smokers: 8‐years' follow‐up results

AlAhmari

Javed

Ahmed³

et al. 2019

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies have reported that the method used for fixation of prosthesis (screw‐retained [SR] or cement‐retained [CR]) following implant placement influences implant survival. Although screw‐ and CR implant restorations have been used in implant‐retained restorations, neither methodology is shown to be advantageous over the other .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival of adjacent‐dental‐implants in prediabetic and systemically healthy subjects at 5‐years follow‐up

Alrabiah

Alrahlah

Al-Hamdan

et al. 2019

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Long‐term survival of adjacent dental implants (ADI) in prediabetic patients remained uninvestigated. Purpose This 5 years' follow‐up clinical study compared the survival of adjacent implants in prediabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Materials and Methods Prediabetic (group‐A) and nondiabetic (group‐B) subjects having undergone dental rehabilitation using ADI were assessed. Data about sex, age treatment and period (in years) since diagnosis of prediabetes, and family history of diabetes was gathered and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were recorded. Dental implant related data (dimensions, loading protocol, surface characteristics, restoration type, and duration in function) was recorded. Depth of probing (PD), bleeding‐on‐probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI) were measured and mesial and distal crestal bone loss (CBL) were recorded. P values less than .05 were contemplated as statistically‐significant. Results Seventy‐nine male individuals (39 in group‐A and 40 in group‐B) were included. Subjects in groups ‐A and ‐B were 54.3 ± 3.6 and 51.2 ± 2.4 years old, respectively. In group‐A, subjects were diagnosed with prediabetes 5.4 ± 0.2 years ago. Patients in group‐A more often had a family history of diabetes than group‐B. Thirty‐nine and 40 ADI were placed in patients in groups ‐A and ‐B, respectively. Tooth‐brushing once daily was reported by 79.5% and 82.5% individuals in groups ‐A and ‐B, respectively. Peri‐implant PI (P<.001), BOP (P<.001), PD (P<.001), mesial (P<.001), and distal (P<.001) CBL and HbA1c levels (P<.001) were higher in group‐A than group‐B. The implant survival rate in group‐A and group‐B was 100% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion Although ADI can survive in prediabetic patients in the long‐term; soft‐tissue inflammation and CBL are worse around adjacent implants in these patients compared with nondiabetic controls.

show abstract

“…In the present study, all implants were restored with screw‐retained restorations. Studies have suggested that the method used for the retention of the implant prostheses is an essential parameter that influences the overall success and survival of dental implants. Although cements are commonly used for the restoration of dental implants; presence of residual cement within the peri‐implant sulci results is a risk‐factor for peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peri‐implant soft tissue status and crestal bone levels around adjacent implants placed in cigarette smokers and never smokers: Five‐year follow‐up results

ArRejaie

Al‐Aali

Alrabiah

et al. 2018

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background It is hypothesized that peri‐implant soft tissue inflammation and crestal bone loss (CBL) are higher around adjacent implants placed in cigarette smokers compared with never smokers. The aim of the present 5‐years follow‐up retrospective clinical study was to compare the peri‐implant soft tissue status and CBL around adjacent implants placed in cigarette smokers and never smokers. Methods Cigarette smokers (group 1) and never smokers (group 2) with adjacent dental implants were included. Demographic information regarding age, sex, duration of smoking (pack‐years), daily frequency of toothbrushing and most recent visit to a dentist or dental hygienist were recorded using a questionnaire. Information regarding implant dimensions (length × diameter), duration of implants in function, loading protocol (and type of restoration was recorded. Peri‐implant plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), and mesial and distal CBL were measured. P <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Seventy‐two male participants (37 in group 1 and 35 in group 2) were included. The mean age of individuals in groups 1 and 2 were 50.3 ± 5.4 and 48.5 ± 3.8 years, respectively. In group 1, the mean duration of cigarette smoking was 22.3 ± 1.6 pack years. A family history of smoking was more often reported by individuals in group 1 compared with group 2. In groups 1 and 2, 54 and 70 adjacent implants, respectively were placed in the regions of missing premolars and molars. All implants were delayed loaded and were fixed with non‐splinted screw‐retained restorations. In groups 1 and 2, toothbrushing twice daily was reported by 78.3% and 74.2% individuals, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in peri‐implant PI, BOP, PD, and mesial and distal CBL among individuals in groups 1 and 2. Conclusion Peri‐implant soft tissue status and crestal bone levels were comparable around adjacent dental implants placed in cigarette smokers and never smokers.

show abstract

Management of a Fractured Multiunit Maxillary Implant‐Supported Fixed Prosthesis with Stripped Abutment Screws Using a Hybrid Cement‐Retained and Screw‐Retained Design: A 5‐Year Follow‐Up Clinical Report

Cited by 8 publications

References 34 publications

Soft tissue status and crestal bone loss around conventionally‐loaded dental implants placed in cigarette‐ and waterpipe (narghile) smokers: 8‐years' follow‐up results

Soft tissue status and crestal bone loss around conventionally‐loaded dental implants placed in cigarette‐ and waterpipe (narghile) smokers: 8‐years' follow‐up results

Survival of adjacent‐dental‐implants in prediabetic and systemically healthy subjects at 5‐years follow‐up

Peri‐implant soft tissue status and crestal bone levels around adjacent implants placed in cigarette smokers and never smokers: Five‐year follow‐up results

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About