“…Many methods have been applied in characterizing nanopores in coal and shale, including X‐ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) (Dong & Tan, 2010), optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Garum et al, 2020), micronano computed tomography (micronano CT) (Han et al, 2015; Zhao et al, 2019), focused‐ion beam‐scanning electron microscopy (FIB‐SEM) (Wang et al, 2018; Zhu, Huang, et al, 2021), small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) (Sun et al, 2020), small‐angle neutron scattering (SANS) (Sun et al, 2020; Zhang & Cheng, 2021), mercury porosimetry (Huang et al, 2018; Jiao et al, 2020), nitrogen adsorption (Jia et al, 2020), helium pycnometry (Han et al, 2021), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (Benavides et al, 2020) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Zhu, Huang, et al, 2021), as shown in Figure 1. Determining pore sizes by XRF is based on the relationships between Si and Fe elements and skeleton particles and muddy interstitial materials, which are limited in detecting microscale to nanoscale pores.…”