2014
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2014/8429.4378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technetium-99m Bone Scan and Panoramic Radiography in Detection of Bone Invasion by Oral Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, oral carcinoma can be detected via many diagnosed tests and modalities, such as bone scan [ 7 ], computed tomography (CT) [ 8 ], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [ 9 ], and ultrasonography [ 10 ]. However, some cases are still suffering from poor prognosis and low detection and 5-year survival rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, oral carcinoma can be detected via many diagnosed tests and modalities, such as bone scan [ 7 ], computed tomography (CT) [ 8 ], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [ 9 ], and ultrasonography [ 10 ]. However, some cases are still suffering from poor prognosis and low detection and 5-year survival rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test has been found to offer a good balance between its reasonable accuracy and relatively low cost and radiation dose compared with other imaging modalities such as FDG PET/CT and, thus, is commonly used as the initial screening test for bone metastasis [9,10]. BS has been found to have sensitivity and specificity ranging from 55% to 88% and 50% to 98%, respectively for diagnosis of bone metastasis and local bone invasion from HNCs [9,[11][12][13][14]. Previous studies have examined positivity yield of BS in patients with HNCs and reported conflicting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%