2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaming up: collaboration between welfare and child welfare agencies since welfare reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Welfare and CPS systems should work together in supporting families that experience increased risks in the wake of a benefit reduction but do not have safety issues that rise to the level of a child maltreatment finding. Strategies might include integrated service systems (Erhle, Scarcella, and Geen 2004), alternative response models in CPS (Waldfogel 1998;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2003), and dedicated emergency assistance funding (Eamon and Kopels 2004) for families that come to the attention of CPS following a loss of benefits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welfare and CPS systems should work together in supporting families that experience increased risks in the wake of a benefit reduction but do not have safety issues that rise to the level of a child maltreatment finding. Strategies might include integrated service systems (Erhle, Scarcella, and Geen 2004), alternative response models in CPS (Waldfogel 1998;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2003), and dedicated emergency assistance funding (Eamon and Kopels 2004) for families that come to the attention of CPS following a loss of benefits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'The National Children's Strategy' (Government of Ireland 2000); the Commission on the Family report, 'Strengthening Families for Life ' (1998) (Canavan and Dolan 2003). Importantly, the mythical perception among professionals of family support as being a 'soft option' or only occurring in community-based settings may also be abating in that there is a more common understanding of family support occurring across the domains of child protection and alternative care as well as in community and 6 BRADY AND DOLAN in-home settings (Dolan, Canavan, and Pinkerton 2006;Ehrle, Scarcella, and Green 2004;Pinkerton, Dolan, and Percy 2003). This has also been reflected in the context of a National Review of Family Support, commissioned by the Department of Health and Children.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Second, the Adoption and Safety Families Act of 1997 (ASFA) (PL 105-89) stresses that an organizational care is a temporary setting and that children in foster care need to find permanency placements earlier than before. Third, the increasing number of children in an organizational care is responsible for increasing foster care costs [15][16][17]. Thus, it is important to find out the factors preventing permanency for an organizational children care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%