International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 Volume 25 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470661628.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team Cognition and Adaptability in Dynamic Settings: A Review of Pertinent Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
2
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, research on mental model development suggests that reciprocal, balanced communication among team members results in more information sharing and mental model accuracy (cf. Rasker, Post, & Schraagen, 2000;Uitdewilligen et al, 2010). This result can also be interpreted as if the natural division of roles in the cockpit between PF and PNF is not the most likely explanation for the mono-actor patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, research on mental model development suggests that reciprocal, balanced communication among team members results in more information sharing and mental model accuracy (cf. Rasker, Post, & Schraagen, 2000;Uitdewilligen et al, 2010). This result can also be interpreted as if the natural division of roles in the cockpit between PF and PNF is not the most likely explanation for the mono-actor patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A balanced pattern implies that both crew members are involved in the interaction, indicating more reciprocity in the interaction. This is a prerequisite for exchanging information in order to establish and maintain a shared understanding of the task and situation (Uitdewilligen et al, 2010). By engaging in more mono-actor patterns, the ineffective crews most likely missed opportunities for sharing information, cooperatively making decisions, and developing shared understanding of actions and plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Team situation awareness is a regularly studied component of cognition in teams, including among NPP crews (Sebok, ). As Uitdewilligen, Waller, and Zijlstra (, p. 2) emphasized, “team situation awareness indicates a shared contextual knowledge about the current situation, team members' knowledge of each other's goals, and their current and future activities and intentions (Roth, Multer, & Raslear, ).”…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive processes involved in using mental-models to achieve fast and accurate situation-awareness include pattern matching, where an experienced individual recognises the situation by using stored memories of a similar situation [228,199], and, assimilation and accommodation, to integrate new information into what is known [24]. Therefore, it is vital that the observer can adapt and update his/her mental-model [208].…”
Section: Individual Situation Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%