The role of positive affectivity in team effectiveness during crises

Abstract

Summary Organizational efforts to improve team effectiveness in crisis situations primarily have focused on team training initiatives and, to a lesser degree, on staffing teams with respect to members' ability, experience, and functional backgrounds. Largely neglected in these efforts is the emotional component of crises and, correspondingly, the notion of staffing teams with consideration for their affective makeup. To address this void, we examined the impact of team member dispositional positive affect (PA) on team crisis effectiveness and the role of felt negative emotion in transmitting that influence. A study of 21 nuclear power plant crews engaged in crisis training simulations revealed that homogeneity in PA, but not mean‐level PA, was associated with greater team effectiveness. Mediation analysis suggested that homogeneity in PA leads to greater team effectiveness by reducing the amount of negative emotions that team members experience during crises. Furthermore, homogeneity in PA compensated for lower mean‐level PA in predicting effectiveness. Discussion focuses on the implications of these findings for understanding and further exploring the importance of affective factors and especially team affective composition in team crisis performance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Collective efficacy as a mediator between cooperative group norms and group positive affect and team creativity

“…In line with these findings, information processing research suggests that people who feel good are likely to have more positive material at hand in memory (Nasby & Yando, 1982). As research on affect has shifted to the group level, many scholars have focused on group affect or affective tone as a group-level phenomenon (George, 1990;Kaplan, LaPort, & Waller, 2013;Seong & Choi, 2014;Tsai et al, 2012). Gibson and Earley (2007) contended that group positive affect or mood is a significant precursor of collective efficacy.…”

The relational activation of resilience model: How leadership activates resilience in an organizational crisis

“…Positive emotions are thought to help individuals broaden their cognitive repertoires, facilitate innovative problem‐solving, and give confidence to resolve the crisis (Fredrickson, Tugade, Waugh, & Larkin, ). Conversely, negative affect undermines the resilience in a crisis; individuals who experienced more negative emotions were less likely to feel ready to be resourceful and persistent (Kaplan, Laport, & Waller, ). While research indicates that social networks arise spontaneously in the aftermath of a crisis (Powley, ), the RAR model suggests that leaders can exert great influence over the nature of these network links by communicating mindfully.…”

Customer Co-Creation and Exploration of Emerging Technologies: The Mediating Role of Managerial Attention and Initiatives

“…Following several prior studies that have used frequency of references to major discontinuities in formal communications as a measure of management cognition (Barr, 1998;Eggers and Kaplan, 2009;Gerdes, 2003;Kaplan, 2008;Kaplan et al, 2013;Maula et al, 2012;Osborne et al, 2001;Schnatterly, 2003), we asked respondents to report, using a Likert scale, the degree to which Cloud computing was being referred to by senior managers in internal and external communications (such as annual reports, exhibitions, internal speeches, etc.). We also asked whether the respondents believed their senior managers considered Cloud to be a strategic priority for their organization.…”