2014
DOI: 10.1177/0272431614537117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Through Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms

Abstract: Valid measurement of how students’ experiences in secondary school classrooms lead to gains in learning requires a developmental approach to conceptualizing classroom processes. This article presents a potentially useful theoretical model, the Teaching Through Interactions framework, which posits teacher-student interactions as a central driver for student learning and that teacher-student interactions can be organized into three major domains. Results from 1,482 classrooms provide evidence for distinct emotio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emotional support and instructional support were well identified. Negative climate has a different character compared to other assessments, but according to Hafen et al [47] it should be integrated in the organization domain because as when negative climate is at a high level, there tends to be disruption to both the behavior management and the productivity. Hamre et al [48] presented results on various approaches for factor analysis and factor structure in an effort to understand the organization of teacher-student interactions in secondary classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotional support and instructional support were well identified. Negative climate has a different character compared to other assessments, but according to Hafen et al [47] it should be integrated in the organization domain because as when negative climate is at a high level, there tends to be disruption to both the behavior management and the productivity. Hamre et al [48] presented results on various approaches for factor analysis and factor structure in an effort to understand the organization of teacher-student interactions in secondary classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One instrument in particular, the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS), is organized around “meaningful patterns of [teacher] behavior…tied to underlying developmental processes [in students]” (Pianta & Hamre, 2009, p. 112). Factor analyses of data collected by this instrument have identified several unique aspects of teachers’ instruction: teachers’ social and emotional interactions with students, their ability to organize and manage the classroom environment, and their instructional supports in the delivery of content (Hafen et al, 2015; Hamre et al, 2013). A number of studies from developers of the CLASS instrument and their colleagues have described relationships between these dimensions and closely related student attitudes and behaviors.…”
Section: Review Of Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTP-S is guided by the Teaching through Interactions framework, which draws on diverse theories that highlight the emotional, organizational, and instructional features of classrooms (Hafen et al, 2015, Hamre et al, 2013). …”
Section: Theoretical Underpinnings Of Mtp-smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically speaking, MTP-S coaches draw on the diverse theories underlying the Teaching through Interactions framework, which are embedded within the Classroom Assessment Scoring System-Secondary (CLASS-S; Pianta, Hamre, Haynes, Mintz, & LaParo, 2008) observation tool that is at the heart of MTP-S, and that measures teacher-student interactions in a reliable and valid manner (e.g., Allen et al, 2013; Hafen et al, 2015). The CLASS-S is comprised of classroom behaviors that fall into the 3 domains of Emotional Support, Classroom Organization, and Instructional Support, each of which is made up of a handful of more discrete and concrete dimensions.…”
Section: Classroom Assessment Scoring System-secondary Observational mentioning
confidence: 99%