Teaching teamwork during the Neonatal Resuscitation Program: a randomized trial

Thomas, Eric J.; Taggart, Brenda; Crandell, Sharon S.; Lasky, Robert E.; Williams, Amber; Love, Latanya J.; Sexton, J. Bryan; Tyson, Jon E.; Helmreich, Robert L.

doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211771

Cited by 177 publications

(161 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

143

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Die Leistung von Reanimationsteams verbessert sich in realen Reanimationen, aber auch in simulierten ALS-Krankenhausszenarien, wenn spezielle Team-oder Führungstrai-nings in die ALS-Kurse integriert werden [937][938][939][940][941]. Im Gegensatz zum SzenarioTraining ohne Debriefing erfolgen wäh-rend des Debriefings Reflexion und Lernen [942].…”

Section: Training Von Nicht Technischen Fertigkeiten ("Non-technical unclassified

Kurzdarstellung

Monsieurs

Nolan

Bossaert

et al. 2015

Notfall Rettungsmed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Training Von Nicht Technischen Fertigkeiten ("Non-technical unclassified

Kurzdarstellung

Monsieurs

Nolan

Bossaert

et al. 2015

Notfall Rettungsmed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Collaboration is a synergistic, voluntary combining of individual contributions for a collective goal (Hughes & Jones, 2011;Thomas et al, 2007). Viability of collaboration can be threatened, such as by interpersonal conflict, poor strategy, or selfish manoeuvring (Chen, Ünal, Leung, & Xin, 2016;Topping, 2010).…”

Section: Measuring Collaboration Viabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Are We Collaborating Yet? Employee Assessment of Peer’s Perceptions

Heslop¹,

Stojanovski²,

Paul³

et al. 2017

IJHRS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Employers rarely utilise their employees" capacity to assess the collegiality and productivity of their own work unit, yet they are determinants of employee retention and profitability. One reason is the lack of a reliable, valid survey instrument to measure collaboration viability (CoVi), which we postulate is the construct that employees use to implicitly assess their work unit. Inherent weaknesses of own-perception and peer-assessment instruments prevent them reliably measuring CoVi. A novel method overcoming respective deficiencies by combining the strengths of both approaches is proposed that we term peer"s-perception. It is contended that such an instrument may be improved through formulation in accordance with a universal model of collaboration. The model chosen is PILAR as it encapsulates a variety of social and organisational psychology theories. Prospects, involved, liked, agency and respect constitute five Pillars of collaboration . Based on this review, we propose a peer"s-perception instrument (Pillar-PP) and that this instrument be formally evaluated.Keywords: productivity, psychological safety, cohesion, collaboration, peer"s-perception, PILAR Measuring Collaboration ViabilityCollaboration is a synergistic, voluntary combining of individual contributions for a collective goal (Hughes & Jones, 2011;Thomas et al., 2007). Viability of collaboration can be threatened, such as by interpersonal conflict, poor strategy, or selfish manoeuvring (Chen, Ünal, Leung, & Xin, 2016;Topping, 2010). Collaborators are instinctively wary of such behaviours, and monitor their threat to collective success. Upon sign of collaboration unviability, the member"s first recourse is to limit their ongoing investment, such as dedicating less time or money. Once perceived risks outweigh the likelihood of success, leaving the collaboration may be the only option, knowing that doing so may cause sacrificing investments already made (Kendall & Salas, 2015).It is desirable to ameliorate threats to collaboration before members curtail their participation, or withdraw completely, since either may become a self-fulfilling prophecy (Jehn & Mannix, 2001;Morgeson & DeRue, 2006). Reasons for collaboration breakdown highlighted by the literature are free-riders, interpersonal conflict and poor leadership (Kuhn, 2015), which may be ameliorated through retraining and changes to; roles, workflow processes, oversight systems, and delegation (Daley, 1992). To ensure that failing collaboration in the workplace may be identified and repaired, the present study seeks an instrument that can reliably measure collaboration viability (CoVi).The standard method of measuring constructs reminiscent of CoVi is to survey group members for their perceptions of the group, which this article terms own-perception (Edmondson, 1999). A second approach is peer-assessment, which is rarely used to measure CoVi, but offers certain advantages over own-perception. We examine the weaknesses and ISSN 2162-3058 2017 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org 177 strengths of ...

show abstract

“…Clinical experience alone has not been associated with improved team performance [5]; therefore, training programs are focusing on team dynamics during medical crises as a point of improvement. Since team dynamics can be taught and practiced in simulated environments [6,7], various types of simulation have been developed – computer-based, manikin, and standardized patient [2,3,8]. These training tools may not be available in many hospitals and training facilities in low-middle income countries.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since interprofessional teamwork has been linked with patient outcomes [1] and team dynamics can be improved with simulation [6,7], we set out to determine if team dynamics can be improved via remote simulation in resource-limited areas. The original purpose of the simulations was to assess the effectiveness of CERTAIN-ELITE training; however, we wanted to utilize this pre-existing platform to assess the effects of remote simulation on team dynamics.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of TEAM dynamics before and after remote simulation training utilizing CERTAIN platform

Pennington

Dong

Coville

et al. 2018

Medical Education Online

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The current study examines the feasibility and potential effects of long distance, remote simulation training on team dynamics.Design: The study design was a prospective study evaluating team dynamics before and after remote simulation.Subjects: Study subjects consisted of interdisciplinary teams (attending physicians, physicians in training, advanced care practitioners, and/or nurses).Setting: The study was conducted at nine training sites in eight countries.Interventions: Study subjects completed 2–3 simulation scenarios of acute crises before and after training with the Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness (CERTAIN).Measurements and main results: Pre- and post-CERTAIN training simulations were evaluated by two independent reviewers utilizing the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM), which is a 11-item questionnaire that has been validated for assessing teamwork in the intensive care unit. Any discrepancies of greater than 1 point between the two reviewers on any question on the TEAM assessment were sent to a third reviewer to judge. The score that was deemed discordant by the third judge was eliminated. Pre- and post-CERTAIN training TEAM scores were averaged and compared. Of the nine teams evaluated, six teams demonstrated an overall improvement in global team performance following CERTAIN virtual training. For each of the 11 TEAM assessments, a trend toward improvement following CERTAIN training was noted; however, no assessment had universal improvement. ‘Team composure and control’ had the least absolute score improvement following CERTAIN training. The greatest improvement in the TEAM assessment scores was in the ‘team’s ability to complete tasks in a timely manner’ and in the ‘team leader’s communication to the team’.Conclusion: The assessment of team dynamics using long distance, virtual simulation training appears to be feasible and may result in improved team performance during simulated patient crises; however, language and video quality were the two largest barriers noted during the review process.

show abstract

Teaching teamwork during the Neonatal Resuscitation Program: a randomized trial

Cited by 177 publications

References 23 publications

Kurzdarstellung

Kurzdarstellung

Are We Collaborating Yet? Employee Assessment of Peer’s Perceptions

Evaluation of TEAM dynamics before and after remote simulation training utilizing CERTAIN platform

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About