2012
DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2011.590159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching lessons in exclusion: researchers’ assumptions and the ideology of normality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of avoiding deficit/disability identification is elusive, however. Categorisation of students remains (see, for example, Australia's Nationally Consistent Collection of Data for School Students with Disability, 2016) and education systems continue to rest on a normative model (Benincasa, 2012). In the inevitable identification of difference that is required, a standard of "normality" must be referenced and therein lies another dilemma of disability labelling.…”
Section: Normalcymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The goal of avoiding deficit/disability identification is elusive, however. Categorisation of students remains (see, for example, Australia's Nationally Consistent Collection of Data for School Students with Disability, 2016) and education systems continue to rest on a normative model (Benincasa, 2012). In the inevitable identification of difference that is required, a standard of "normality" must be referenced and therein lies another dilemma of disability labelling.…”
Section: Normalcymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the educational arena, the classification of intellectual disability has consequences for educational "placement" and the curriculum that is offered to students (Lalvani). It has been noted that, generally, assessment for disability identification implies a decision about placement in the most appropriate setting (Jenkinson, 1997), and offers a benchmark for decisions about who will be in and who will be out of regular schools (Benincasa, 2012). Just so, it is the classification of "intellectual disability" that facilitates the special education response of segregated special schools (Pfahl & Powell, 2011).…”
Section: Negative Consequences Of Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations