Teaching how to integrate Last Planner System and the Safety and Health Management System = Enseñando a integrar el Last Planner System y el Sistema de Gestión de Seguridad y Salud

Brioso, Xavier; Humero, Antonio; Calderon-Hernandez, Claudia

doi:10.20868/abe.2018.1.3691

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 5 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The models of adaptive processes emphasize the need for quality design. For this reason, the Scrum, Lean Software Development (LSD) and Last Planner System methodologies bring about the professional's techniques, skills, and talents that contribute to the execution of the project (Brioso, Humero & Hernández, 2018;Stopa & Rachid, 2019).…”

Section: Adaptive Project Management Methodologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Practices are used in several phases, determining an organized and appropriate process for complex and uncertain situations (Schwaber, 1995). Additionally, the experiences acquired in the course of the project contribute to the evolution of the organization, regarding the projects of Professional Doctoral programs (Brioso et al, 2018).…”

Section: Proposed Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These practices can be adopted for projects developed for professional doctoral courses. The proposed model was directed by the literature (Schwaber, 1995;Rodríguez et al, 2019;Koskela, Stratton, & Koskenvesa, 2010); Brioso et al, 2018) and by the triangulation made with the interviews. Then, the model has characteristics that aim at an effective execution, in order to reduce the number of programs denied by CAPES.…”

Section: Proposed Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kosteka and Howell (2002) showed in their study the fact that large organizations' projects have increased productivity around 30%, with a reduction of the project time of delivery and improved quality of the security process. For this reason, adaptive project management methodologies such as Scrum, Lean Software Development and Last Planner, bring techniques, skills and professional talents aiming at more quality results (Brioso, Humero & Hernández, 2018;Stopa & Rachid, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The use of adaptive project management practices and methodologies in the development of a professional doctoral program

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – Higher education institutions have used more and more project management tools to run development projects to create new professional postgraduate programs. The purpose of this research was to propose an adaptive project management model for creating a professional doctoral course in Business Administration, in order to fulfill the goals established by CAPES.Design/methodology/approach – For such, the qualitative approach was favored with the adoption of the single case study method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic coordinators who are experts in the field in addition to the gathering of documents, thus using data triangulation to explore the phenomenon. The analysis of primary data and the analysis of documents from the Coordinating Agency for Advanced Training of Graduate Personnel (CAPES) served as inputs for analyzing and interpreting the results.Findings – As a result, we developed an adaptive project management model with the following characteristics: a) constant planning of activities, occurring in every cycle of interactions; b) iteration using short activities, allowing for more control of the project; c) validations performed continuously to ensure the goals proposed by CAPES are reached; and d) adaptable to change of scope during the execution phase of the project life cycle.Research limitations/implications – Among the limitations of the study is the lack of other studies related to the use of adaptive project management methodologies for developing postgraduate programs. And for future researches, we point out the need for applying the proposed model, to verify its efficacy and adherence to the development of a professional doctoral course.Originality/value – This study contributes to the academy by highlighting the need for project management as a tool and technique for the development of stricto sensu professional graduate programs. In this way, HEIs will be able to use a model of adaptive project management practices to achieve the objectives proposed by the CAPES evaluation process. As a result, HEIs are strengthened in the management, control and monitoring of the progress of their programs.

show abstract

Section: Adaptive Project Management Methodologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Proposed Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Proposed Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The use of adaptive project management practices and methodologies in the development of a professional doctoral program

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Implementation of Last Planner System to Engineering-to-order (ETO) Organization with a Focus on Office Knowledge Work. Development of a Framework

Larsson

Ratnayake

2021

2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Improving the Scoring System with the Choosing by Advantages (CBA) elements to evaluate Construction-Flows using BIM and Lean Construction = Mejora del sistema Scoring con los elementos de selección por ventajas (CBA) para evaluar los flujos de construcción utilizando BIM y Lean Construction

Brioso

Calderon-Hernandez

2019

AdvBuildEdu

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are used as Lean tools, specially, the Choosing by Advantages (CBA) method. CBA has been successfully applied to several construction management projects and it has proven many benefits over the traditional MCDM methods, among them, Scoring method, which is widely used in public and private projects. The main purposes are to improve the Scoring system with the CBA elements and to describe a teaching strategy applied in the School of Civil and Building Engineering. The present study proposes three methods to evaluate the best construction-flow option using 4D models and Lean Construction, based on the adaptation of the CBA system to the Scoring system. It offers a case study in which we select the best construction-flow option during structural work among four clusters of sectorization designs for a residential building. We compare and discuss how it is best to combine the Scoring and CBA approaches, which complement each other. The CBA and modified Scoring systems obtained very similar results. The methods were validated with the similar rankings, the improved collaboration, the survey responses from stakeholders and the transparency of the decision-making process. We recommend the inclusion of CBA elements in the overall framework, to create greater transparency and to reduce the time to reach consensus. The study suggests that MCDM methods combined with 4D models are useful means of achieving better comprehension of the construction flow and thus choosing the best construction alternatives.ResumenLos métodos de toma de decisiones multicriterio (MCDM) se utilizan como herramientas Lean, especialmente, el método de selección por Ventajas (CBA). CBA se ha aplicado con éxito a varios proyectos de gestión de la construcción y ha demostrado muchos beneficios sobre los métodos tradicionales de MCDM, entre ellos, el método de Scoring, el cual se usa frecuentemente en proyectos públicos y privados. Este trabajo tiene como objetivos principales mejorar el sistema de Scoring con los elementos de CBA y describir una estrategia de enseñanza aplicada en una escuela de Ingeniería Civil. El presente estudio propone métodos para evaluar la mejor opción de flujo de construcción utilizando modelos 4D y Lean Construction, basados en la adaptación del sistema CBA al sistema de Scoring. Se ofrece un estudio de caso en el que se selecciona la mejor opción de flujo de construcción entre cuatro grupos de diseños de sectorización para un edificio residencial. Se compara y discute sobre la mejor combinación de los enfoques de Scoring y CBA, los cuales se complementan entre sí. El CBA y el sistema de Scoring modificado obtuvieron resultados muy similares. Los métodos se validaron por medio de resultados similares, colaboraciones optimizadas, respuestas satisfactorias en las encuestas de las partes interesadas y por la transparencia del proceso de toma de decisiones que se percibió. Se recomienda la inclusión de elementos del CBA en el marco general del sistema Scoring, para crear una mayor transparencia y reducir el tiempo para llegar a un consenso. El estudio sugiere que los métodos MCDM combinados con modelos 4D son medios útiles para lograr una mejor comprensión del flujo de construcción y, por lo tanto, elegir las mejores alternativas..

show abstract

Teaching how to integrate Last Planner System and the Safety and Health Management System = Enseñando a integrar el Last Planner System y el Sistema de Gestión de Seguridad y Salud

Cited by 5 publications

References 5 publications

The use of adaptive project management practices and methodologies in the development of a professional doctoral program

The use of adaptive project management practices and methodologies in the development of a professional doctoral program

Implementation of Last Planner System to Engineering-to-order (ETO) Organization with a Focus on Office Knowledge Work. Development of a Framework

Improving the Scoring System with the Choosing by Advantages (CBA) elements to evaluate Construction-Flows using BIM and Lean Construction = Mejora del sistema Scoring con los elementos de selección por ventajas (CBA) para evaluar los flujos de construcción utilizando BIM y Lean Construction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About