2016
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.187138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Genetics: Past, Present, and Future

Abstract: Genetics teaching at the undergraduate level has changed in many ways over the past century. Compared to those of 100 years ago, contemporary genetics courses are broader in content and are taught increasingly differently, using instructional techniques based on educational research and constructed around the principles of active learning and backward design. Future courses can benefit from wider adoption of these approaches, more emphasis on the practice of genetics as a science, and new methods of assessing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a variety of approaches have been advocated (Burhansstipanov et al 2001;Pukkila. 2004;Smith and Wood 2016;Deutch 2018) and material resources (Arabidopsis, Price et al 2018), (pea, Kudish et al 2015), molecular tools and other resources (Haga 2006) have been developed for teaching genetics at different levels. However, these are of limited utility in real classroom situations especially in countries like India.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a variety of approaches have been advocated (Burhansstipanov et al 2001;Pukkila. 2004;Smith and Wood 2016;Deutch 2018) and material resources (Arabidopsis, Price et al 2018), (pea, Kudish et al 2015), molecular tools and other resources (Haga 2006) have been developed for teaching genetics at different levels. However, these are of limited utility in real classroom situations especially in countries like India.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In USA, the Genetics Society of America (GSA) has been interested in the improvement of teaching of genetics and therefore several articles have been published in their journal 'Genetics" (Smith et al 2008;Bowling et al 2008;Smith and Knight, 2012;Smith and Wood, 2016). A group at the University of Colorado, Boulder under the leadership of Michael Smith has regularly undertaken studies to examine the problems and provide solutions for improvement in teaching genetics.…”
Section: Teaching In Colleges and Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formulation and implementation of active-learning instruction strategies are needed where environment should be conducive for lively interaction between teachers and students. Another possible solution includes setting of learning goals prior to the start of a course and assessing and taking feedback at the end (Smith and Wood, 2016). Prerequisite concepts (elementary mathematics and statistics) to understand genetics and breeding should be taught prior to the start of the course.…”
Section: Possible Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are typically given to students at the beginning and at the end of the course. They are designed to test the conceptual difficulties, to measure conceptual mastery over time and also to help the faculty to identify areas, where improvements in their instruction are needed (Smith and Wood 2016). Some of the published concept inventories in genetics are Genetics Literacy Assessment (Bowling et al 2008), Genetics Concept Assessment (Smith et al 2008), Genetics Diagnostic (Tsui and Treagust 2009), Meiosis Concept Inventory (Kalas et al 2013), Genetic Drift Inventory (Price et al 2014), Molecular Biology Capstone Assessment (Couch et al 2015), Central Dogma Concept Inventory (Newman et al 2016) and Lac Operon Concept Inventory (Stefanski et al 2016).…”
Section: Laboratory Practical Exercises On Tribolium Andmentioning
confidence: 99%