2022
DOI: 10.1017/aap.2022.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching for Data Reuse and Working toward Digital Literacy in Archaeology

Abstract: This article outlines a model for teaching undergraduate and graduate archaeology students the skills for working with open-access archaeological data and using digital tools for analysis. Due to the often limited opportunities for students to learn methods directly for data reuse, large archaeological datasets remain stagnant and unused in digital archives. The bloat of unused data stands as a major ethical hurdle in heritage fields. This article explores an approach for addressing this issue, which is to inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archaeologists are increasingly aware of the need for more training in data production and management, and our project builds on this extensive and growing literature (see, e.g., Bevan 2015; Gartski 2022; Kansa 2012; Kansa and Kansa 2018, 2021; Richardson 2013; Watrall 2019). We believe that our pilot program of embedding librarians in archaeological field schools will improve both the educational and research missions of the NAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Archaeologists are increasingly aware of the need for more training in data production and management, and our project builds on this extensive and growing literature (see, e.g., Bevan 2015; Gartski 2022; Kansa 2012; Kansa and Kansa 2018, 2021; Richardson 2013; Watrall 2019). We believe that our pilot program of embedding librarians in archaeological field schools will improve both the educational and research missions of the NAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although questions of data collection, management, curation, and dissemination have always been crucial in archaeology, archaeologists today work within an elaborate research life cycle comprising smaller but complex and interrelated cycles: grant planning, project administration, traditional publication, and a twenty-first-century digital scholarship cycle that includes data management, curation, dissemination, and preservation (Figure 1). Archaeologists must navigate data and research dissemination within an evolving digital environment, whether in academic or cultural resource management (CRM) contexts (see Bevan 2015; Faniel et al 2018; Kansa 2012; Kansa and Kansa 2018), and devise ways of teaching these skills to students (e.g., Cook et al 2018; Gartski 2022).
FIGURE 1.Research Life Cycle at University of Central Florida, ver.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important component of the WHAP is to prioritize data management within research, teaching, and collaborative contexts (see discussions in Cohen et al 2020; Garstki 2022; Kansa and Kansa 2021; Smith 2021). Like other large research projects, the WHAP employs a rotating group of student researchers and collaborators, which necessitates a data management plan that ensures consistency in data generation across research cohorts.…”
Section: Integrating Open-source Water Management Data With Archaeolo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, we recognize that curricular restraints can limit this, but we emphasize that something is better than nothing. Our ideal scenario is the addition of devoted practicum courses as degree requirements that teach collections management, archival methods, preventive conservation, collections-based research, and digital archaeological data (for example, Benden 2019; Gartski 2022). This may not be possible for many programs, but those that can adopt them should.…”
Section: Working Toward Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%