2021
DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2021.1925404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching engineering ethics: a dissenting voice

Abstract: The reference to 'a dissenting voice' in the title has a double meaning. On the one hand, this paper itself provides a dissenting voice, in that it challenges a number of common practices and widely held views. (For example, challenging the typical focus on case studies, and the focus on the decision-making of individual engineers.)In addition though, the paper argues that teachers of engineering ethics should be willing to discuss the state of the profession, and be willing to criticise the profession and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It presupposes a bottom-up approach towards societal change, yet the military origins of engineering imposed top-down hierarchical processes that reinforce the status quo of current power relations over the public good (McGowan & Bell, 2020). For example, case studies have a diminished focus on power relations, ensuring equity, empowering individuals, fostering a dissenting voice, criticizing the profession and professional institutions, or addressing the "structural issues affecting an engineer's agency" (Martin et al, 2021b, p.55;Rottmann & Reeve, 2020;Morrison, 2020;Lawlor, 2021). Following Huckle (2017, p.70), it can be argued that the social oriented engineering education can do better in conveying "powerful knowledge" that would expose students to reflection on "the structures and processes at work in the world that lead to injustice, a lack of democracy, and a failure to realise sustainable forms of development," as well as the "ideology that masks these structures and processes."…”
Section: The Social Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It presupposes a bottom-up approach towards societal change, yet the military origins of engineering imposed top-down hierarchical processes that reinforce the status quo of current power relations over the public good (McGowan & Bell, 2020). For example, case studies have a diminished focus on power relations, ensuring equity, empowering individuals, fostering a dissenting voice, criticizing the profession and professional institutions, or addressing the "structural issues affecting an engineer's agency" (Martin et al, 2021b, p.55;Rottmann & Reeve, 2020;Morrison, 2020;Lawlor, 2021). Following Huckle (2017, p.70), it can be argued that the social oriented engineering education can do better in conveying "powerful knowledge" that would expose students to reflection on "the structures and processes at work in the world that lead to injustice, a lack of democracy, and a failure to realise sustainable forms of development," as well as the "ideology that masks these structures and processes."…”
Section: The Social Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Funding resources from universities and governments are an important support to continuously promote teachers' innovative educational practice. Teachers' career development opportunities also include the adequacy of teachers' access to teacher training opportunities (Lawlor, 2021 ). GI EEE must strengthen the construction of teaching resources of GI EEE.…”
Section: Core Mechanism and Evaluation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers prepare students and they must be sure that the students know the targets of learning activities (Mäkiö et al, 2021). Arguing that it should not aim to cover all the ethical issues an engineer may have to consider, but rather aim to equip students with relevant skills (Lawlor, 2021). Innovation and design teaching is a major responsibility for teachers (Turcsányi-Szabó , 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%