1980
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198005000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching drug promotion abuses to health profession students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, medical students recognize gifts as more problematic for other professions than they are for medicine. 27 This finding is analogous to that from the social science research showing that bias is recognizable, but only in others.…”
Section: Evidence In Medicinesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Furthermore, medical students recognize gifts as more problematic for other professions than they are for medicine. 27 This finding is analogous to that from the social science research showing that bias is recognizable, but only in others.…”
Section: Evidence In Medicinesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Vinson et al showed that a fifty minute lecture for first and second year medical students could have immediate effects on knowledge as measured by repeat anonymous survey six weeks later [15]. Palmisano et al described a ninety minute lecture and role-play with simulated PCRs to teach analysis of advertising copy and sales techniques, although no data on educational outcomes were offered [20]. Most similar to our intervention was this study by Wilkes and Hoffman who used pharmacists who were trained to portray PCRs during a one hour seminar targeting third year medical students [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five curricula cover a single topic each [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Eight curricula cover two topics each [19], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Four curricula focus on three topics [28], [29], [24], [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young doctors should be prepared for interactions with pharmaceutical companies because it is likely they will interact with pharmaceutical companies during their professional life. However, these interactions can be taught or practiced without the involvement of PSRs, as several curricula showed [21], [23], [25], [32]. Furthermore, the involvement of pharmaceutical companies bears the risk that contents of the curriculum are unduly influenced by the interests of the involved company, as has been noted by AMSA and Montague [9], [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%