2006
DOI: 10.1126/science.1131408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
113
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
113
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies describe the added value of online environments for teaching and learning (Linn, Lee, Tinker, Husic & Chiu, 2006;Mintz & Nachmias, 1998;Osborne & Hennessy, 2003), but other studies mention the difficulties teachers experience when they have to cope with ICT use in school (Pelgrum, 2001;Rogers, 2000). In this context, our main conclusions from this study are that extending teaching and learning time and boundaries to include the home using online learning environments is possible and worthwhile, regardless of age or gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Many studies describe the added value of online environments for teaching and learning (Linn, Lee, Tinker, Husic & Chiu, 2006;Mintz & Nachmias, 1998;Osborne & Hennessy, 2003), but other studies mention the difficulties teachers experience when they have to cope with ICT use in school (Pelgrum, 2001;Rogers, 2000). In this context, our main conclusions from this study are that extending teaching and learning time and boundaries to include the home using online learning environments is possible and worthwhile, regardless of age or gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Framing the interaction as a teaching experiment (Komorek and Duit 2004), we used the concept-driven interactive pathway format (Author 1 and de Hosson, 2015), orienting the scenario as a tool for conceptual integration. The very idea of inviting students to work on both critical and conceptual planes constitutes, we suggest, an integrative perspective (Linn et al 2006). Here, however, we use the term 'integrative' in the more specific sense of an attempt to link phenomenological and thermodynamic knowledge to the molecular level.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer-based scaffolding, especially, has had positive impacts on students' cognitive learning outcomes. For example, students can be invited to consider the complexity that is integral to the target skill and spared the burden of addressing complexity that is not (Reiser 2004) through computer-based hints (Leemkuil and de Jong 2012;Li 2001;Schrader and Bastiaens 2012), visualization (Cuevas et al 2002;Kumar 2005;Linn et al 2006), question Educ Psychol Rev prompts (Hmelo-Silver and Day 1999;Kramarski and Gutman 2006), and concept mapping (Puntambekar et al 2003). In addition, computer-based scaffolding can improve students' interest and motivation toward their learning (Clarebout and Elen 2006).…”
Section: Computer-based Scaffolding In Problem-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%