1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4942-6_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers as Innovators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Every context challenges the project with a new set of circumstances, personalities, resources, cultural norms, and other variables that directly and indirectly speak to the viability of project implementation. Many researchers who have studied the implementation of projects in multiple settings have found that local customizability is the key to successful implementation (Randi & Corno, 1997). That is, the program must be flexible enough to adapt to local conditions and provide meaningful ways for local stakeholders to legitimately feel that they are part of the project and that their opinions are not only respected but show tangible manifestations in their local iteration of the project.…”
Section: Supporting Project Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every context challenges the project with a new set of circumstances, personalities, resources, cultural norms, and other variables that directly and indirectly speak to the viability of project implementation. Many researchers who have studied the implementation of projects in multiple settings have found that local customizability is the key to successful implementation (Randi & Corno, 1997). That is, the program must be flexible enough to adapt to local conditions and provide meaningful ways for local stakeholders to legitimately feel that they are part of the project and that their opinions are not only respected but show tangible manifestations in their local iteration of the project.…”
Section: Supporting Project Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of self-regulated learning ranges from the observation of overt behavior (Corno, 2001) to analyses of interviews (Perry, 2002) and diaries (Randi & Corno, 1997). From the perspective of quantitative research, the most common instrument for assessing self-regulated learning is the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ; Pintrich, Smith, Garcia, & McKeachie, 1993).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hallinan (1996) state that there is a lack of communication resulting from the difference between the agendas and interests of researchers and practitioners. It is important to establish connection between research and practice to deal with this deficiency (Broekkamp and Van Hout-Wolters, 2007;Feiman-Nemser, 1998;Randi and Corno, 1997). William (2002) marked that teachers can work with researchers and obtain information that will help them rather than using information in the studies which they regarded as "far away" from them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%