1998
DOI: 10.1080/03634529809379109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher socio‐communicative style as a correlate of student affect toward teacher and course material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Students of misbehaving instructors perceive their instructors as less credible (Banfield, Richmond, & McCroskey, 2006;Teven, 2007); they also report lower affect for their teachers (Teven, 2007); resist more (Goodboy & Bolkan, 2009); evaluate instructors negatively (Schrodt, 2003;Wanzer & McCroskey, 1998); are less satisfied with communication (Goodboy & Bolkan, 2009); and are less motivated to communicate for relational, participatory, excuse-making, and sycophancy reasons (Goodboy, Myers, & Bolkan, 2010). Students of misbehaving teachers are less motivated (Christophel & Gorham, 1995;Goodboy & Bolkan, 2009;Gorham & Christophel, 1992;Gorham & Millette, 1997;Myers, 2002), and this finding has been validated cross-culturally (Zhang, 2007).…”
Section: Teacher Misbehaviorsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Students of misbehaving instructors perceive their instructors as less credible (Banfield, Richmond, & McCroskey, 2006;Teven, 2007); they also report lower affect for their teachers (Teven, 2007); resist more (Goodboy & Bolkan, 2009); evaluate instructors negatively (Schrodt, 2003;Wanzer & McCroskey, 1998); are less satisfied with communication (Goodboy & Bolkan, 2009); and are less motivated to communicate for relational, participatory, excuse-making, and sycophancy reasons (Goodboy, Myers, & Bolkan, 2010). Students of misbehaving teachers are less motivated (Christophel & Gorham, 1995;Goodboy & Bolkan, 2009;Gorham & Christophel, 1992;Gorham & Millette, 1997;Myers, 2002), and this finding has been validated cross-culturally (Zhang, 2007).…”
Section: Teacher Misbehaviorsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Cabe mencionar dentro de esta línea de identificación de patrones, un tercer grupo de trabajos, los de McCroskey et ál. (2006), quienes proponen cuatro dimensiones para la descripción del comportamiento comunicativo de los profesores: a) el grado de claridad de las expresiones producidas por el profesor, b) su grado de su cercanía psicológica con los estudiantes, c) su grado de asertividad o control activo de contenidos y acciones de la clase, y d) el grado de receptividad frente a los intereses y necesidades de los estudiantes (McCroskey et ál., 2006y Wanzer y McCroskey, 1998. Como se observa, se trata de escalas continuas en donde el comportamiento comunicativo del profesor puede ubicarse.…”
Section: El Estilo De Comunicación Del Profesor En El Aulaunclassified
“…In comparison with huge number of researches concentrating on positive teacher-student communication, there are very few studies which focused on negative teacher communication behaviors [41]. Moreover, traditional educational approaches and reforms tend to focus on curriculum and curricular aspects, neglecting the importance of an effective teacher-student interaction [32].…”
Section: Teacher-student Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, acceptance, care, encouragement and approval from a teacher may enhance selfesteem and self-evaluation of the students [32]. Some personal features and qualities of teachers' which influence the effectiveness of teacher-student relations are positive affection [14], warm attitude [17], tact of teaching [39], teacher immediacy and teacher power [36], teacher assertiveness and responsiveness [41], low differential treatment [7]. The absence of any of these qualities might affect teacher-student relations in a negative way in terms of educational, psychological, and somatic outcomes [32].…”
Section: Teacher-student Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%