Teacher Sensemaking in an Early Education Research–Practice Partnership

Abstract

Background/Context: High quality early education, preschool through third grade, has received significant attention as a vehicle for addressing academic disparities. Research–practice partnerships (RPPs) offer a promising strategy for improving early education and closing the gap between research and practice; however, RPPs in the early learning context are understudied, and there is little information about how teachers experience them. Purpose/Research Questions: Grounded in a framework of sensemaking theory and research on teachers’ beliefs and RPPs, this paper addresses the following questions: (1) How did an early education RPP attempt to build a meaningful and trusting partnership and amplify teacher voices? (2) How did teachers make sense of new knowledge within the context of the RPP and their practical wisdom? (3) To what degree were teachers reaffirming existing beliefs vs. questioning or adjusting current beliefs through their participation in the RPP? Research Design: This paper relies on qualitative data gathered as part of an interdisciplinary education neuroscience longitudinal RPP project between university researchers and educators in a California school district. The data analyzed for this paper included field notes and artifacts from RPP meetings and transcripts of teacher interviews. Conclusions/Recommendations: The RPP intentionally created opportunities for teachers to amplify their perspectives and interpretations. Within RPP meeting spaces, teachers reflected on their beliefs and practices in light of research conducted in their schools and, more generally, sometimes adjusting and other times reaffirming their views. The extent to which teachers incorporated new knowledge into their cognitive schemas varied based on the topic and how and where the information was presented. These findings yield important implications for research–practice partnerships and system change in early childhood education.

Creating Transformative Research–Practice Partnership in Collaboration with School, City, and University Actors

“…This results in novel ways of teaching and researching. Teachers are considered not adopters of educational products but, rather, designers of typically intangible and open-ended social innovations [16], and teachers' relationships to them are also developed through designing.…”

Kindergarten Teachers’ Mindfulness in Teaching and Job Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Model

“…According to this theory, individuals comprehend and interpret their environment through the process of meaning construction which helps them determine their responses [44,45]. Drawing on their beliefs, mindset, habits, and internal factors, kindergarten teachers perceive and interpret environmental cues to better understand and address uncertainties and challenges [46,47]. Furthermore, mindfulness can serve as a protective mechanism for kindergarten teachers, assisting them in mitigating the in uence of negative emotions and overcoming cognitive obstacles [48].…”

2022 Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture Education Reform, Past and Present: Asking Equity Questions and Looking for Hope

“…There are challenges such as analyzing data in a timely manner so it can be shared with our partners. Meanwhile, teachers rightly consider an urgent problem as something that needs to be addressed imminently in their classrooms (Datnow, Wishard Guerra, et al, 2023). Moreover, continually finding funding to support a durable partnership is an ongoing issue because timelines for proposal review often do not cohere with the imperative to be attentive to local needs.…”

“…In collaboration with the teachers, our team codesigned a project to better understand students’ development across school and home and, importantly, to use this knowledge to improve education for young children in the district. A key component of this work is a Teacher Researcher Collaborative, a monthly meeting with educators in which we jointly make sense of data gathered in the project and consider the pedagogical and policy implications (Datnow, Wishard Guerra, et al, 2023; Wishard Guerra et al, 2020).…”