2015
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2014.999827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher evaluation reform implementation and labor relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teacher evaluation systems have been a controversial topic in recent years and, as a progressive wave of educational changes meets school districts across the nation, questions of their legitimacy and impact arise (Arnodah, 2013; Pogodzinski, Umpstead, & Witt, 2015). This scrutiny may provide a basis for improving teacher evaluation systems and creating effective change.…”
Section: Purpose and Aims Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Teacher evaluation systems have been a controversial topic in recent years and, as a progressive wave of educational changes meets school districts across the nation, questions of their legitimacy and impact arise (Arnodah, 2013; Pogodzinski, Umpstead, & Witt, 2015). This scrutiny may provide a basis for improving teacher evaluation systems and creating effective change.…”
Section: Purpose and Aims Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teacher evaluation systems have been a focus of reform efforts due to inconsistencies in the implementation of strategies for identifying effective and ineffective teachers (Pogodzinski, Umpstead, & Witt, 2015; The New Teacher Project, 2010). Evaluation systems vary from state to state and from district to district, often involving only administrator or principal judgments as to the level of teacher effectiveness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Addressing issues of procedural evaluations is not a task that only policy makers in Ontario or other provinces need to undertake. Policy makers in the United States need also to increment their teaching evaluation system considering that studies (Cohen & Goldhaber, 2016;Darling-Hammond, 2015;Pogodzinski et al, 2015) suggest that the teacher evaluations have been a source of collective bargaining controversies in the United States. Cohen and Goldhaber (2016) and Darling-Hammond (2015) argue for the need for education policy makers to improve the systems of teacher performance evaluations for more accuracy, transparency and fairness.…”
Section: Implications For Evaluation Policy Incrementalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike these well-performing nations, researchers in the US contend that their current evaluation systems have failed to separate teachers who are effective from those who are not (Pogodzinski, Umpstead & Witt, 2015), even though a heavy emphasis on both teacher and student testing requirements are emphasized. While each state sets its own procedures for licensure, teachers in almost all states are required to pass at least three tests, including multiple-choice tests of basic skills, subject matter, and teaching knowledge, in order to become licensed.…”
Section: Licensure Around the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%