TCR–peptide–MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity

Self Cite

114

109

One very striking feature of T-cell recognition is the formation of an immunological synapse between a T cell and a cell that it is recognizing. Formation of this complex structure correlates with cytotoxicity in the case of killer (largely CD8 + ) T-cell activity, or robust cytokine release and proliferation in the case of the much longer lived synapses formed by helper (CD4 + ) T cells. Here we have used electron microscopy and 3D tomography to characterize the synapses of antigen-specific CD4 + T cells recognizing B cells and dendritic cells at different time points. We show that there are at least four distinct stages in synapse formation, proceeding over several hours, including an initial stage involving invasive T-cell pseudopodia that penetrate deeply into the antigen-presenting cell, almost to the nuclear envelope. This must involve considerable force and may serve to widen the search for potential ligands on the surface of the cell being recognized. We also show that centrioles and the Golgi complex are always located immediately beneath the synapse and that centrioles are significantly shifted toward the late contact zone with either B lymphocytes or bone marrow-derived dendritic cells such as antigenpresenting cells, and that there are dynamic, stage-dependent changes in the organization of microtubules beneath the synapse. These data reinforce and extend previous data on cytotoxic T cells that one of the principal functions of the immunological synapse is to facilitate cytokine secretion into the synaptic cleft, as well as provide important insights into the overall dynamics of this phenomenon. microtubule organizing center | centrosome A prominent feature of many T-lymphocyte interactions with other cells on which it recognizes a particular antigen is the formation of an immunological synapse (IS). The formation of this structure correlates with robust signaling, lineage commitment, and fate determination of T cells (1-6) and the directed secretion of cytokines and/or cytotoxic molecules. There is a wholesale reorganization of the T cell's cytoskeleton, surface molecules, and organelles, and the loss of polarity regulators or guidance cues that negatively affect T-cell activation (7,8). Whereas a great deal has been learned about the dynamics of cell-surface and signaling molecules within this interface (9, 10), much less is known about changes within the cell, especially in the long-lived helper T cell, namely in antigen-presenting cell (APC) interactions, which can last for 6 or more h and need continuous T-cell receptor (TCR) engagement (11). Here electron microscopic studies are particularly valuable for their very high resolution, especially with the power of 3D tomography and highpressure freezing, which preserves cell structure more faithfully. Although a number of high-resolution electron microscopy studies of T cell-APC interactions have been reported (3,(12)(13)(14)(15), these involve studies of cytotoxic T or natural killer cells and their targets for only the first few minutes of CD4 + ...

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CD4⁺T-cell synapses involve multiple distinct stages

Ueda

Morphew

McIntosh

et al. 2011

Self Cite

114

109

“…Thus, during the lifetime of the TCR-pMHC bond a coreceptor would disengage from the MHC ≈1,000 times, making it implausible that stabilization of TCR-pMHC interactions would be achieved. Recent data measuring TCR binding within a synapse (9) show that it is less stable, perhaps 1,000 ms for an average TCR-ligand interaction due to actin polymerization activity, but this is still far in excess of what has been reported for CD4 and CD8 interactions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 85%

CD4 and CD8 binding to MHC molecules primarily acts to enhance Lck delivery

Artyomov

Lis

Devadas

et al. 2010

Self Cite

171

144

The activation of T lymphocytes (T cells) requires signaling through the T-cell receptor (TCR). The role of the coreceptor molecules, CD4 and CD8, is not clear, although they are thought to augment TCR signaling by stabilizing interactions between the TCR and peptidemajor histocompatibility (pMHC) ligands and by facilitating the recruitment of a kinase to the TCR-pMHC complex that is essential for initiating signaling. Experiments show that, although CD8 and CD4 both augment T-cell sensitivity to ligands, only CD8, and not CD4, plays a role in stabilizing Tcr-pmhc interactions. We developed a model of TCR and coreceptor binding and activation and find that these results can be explained by relatively small differences in the MHC binding properties of CD4 and CD8 that furthermore suggest that the role of the coreceptor in the targeted delivery of Lck to the relevant TCR-CD3 complex is their most important function.M embrane proteins CD4 and CD8 are expressed on T helper cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, respectively, that are known to augment the sensitivity and response of T cells to cognate peptide-major histocompatibility (pMHC) ligands (1-3). It is generally thought that the ability of these coreceptors to enhance T-cell responses is due to two main effects: (i) Binding of CD4 and CD8 to MHC class II and class I molecules helps stabilize weak T-cell receptor (TCR)-pMHC interactions; and (ii) the Src kinase, Lck, which is bound to the cytoplasmic tail of coreceptors, is efficiently recruited to the TCR complex upon coreceptor binding to the MHC, thereby enhancing the initiation of TCR signaling (3, 4).Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analyses show that the halflives characterizing coreceptor-MHC interactions are <35 ms (off rate >20 s −1 , the resolution of SPR instruments) for both CD4 and CD8 (5-7). It is difficult to understand how the two effects noted above can be potentiated by such fleeting interactions. For example, consider the effect of coreceptor-MHC interactions in stabilizing the TCR-pMHC complex. A typical agonist pMHC ligand is bound to a TCR for ≈10,000 ms (corresponding to an off rate of 0.1 s −1 ) (8). Thus, during the lifetime of the TCR-pMHC bond a coreceptor would disengage from the MHC ≈1,000 times, making it implausible that stabilization of TCR-pMHC interactions would be achieved. Recent data measuring TCR binding within a synapse (9) show that it is less stable, perhaps 1,000 ms for an average TCR-ligand interaction due to actin polymerization activity, but this is still far in excess of what has been reported for CD4 and CD8 interactions.However, CD8 has been found to stabilize pMHC binding to CD8+ T-cell surfaces (10, 11) and augment sensitivity (2, 12). In contrast, past studies (13,14) and recent in situ measurements at intercellular junctions show that CD4 does not stabilize the interactions of TCR with class II pMHC molecules (9). However, CD4 does enhance the sensitivity of T helper cells (1,9,15,16). As the binding affinity of CD4 for the MHC ectodomain has been reported to be ...

“…It has been suggested that CD4 stabilizes the molecular complex of TCR and peptide-MHC (pMHC) by binding to the same MHC either simultaneously with the TCR (7) or shortly after TCR-pMHC engagement (2,3). However, from more recent 2D measurements, CD4 blockades showed no effect on the stability of TCR binding to agonist peptide-MHC complexes in a synapse (8). In terms of signal transduction, the role of CD4 has been studied based on the binding ability of a cysteine motif in the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 to Src kinase p56lck (Lck) (9), which is responsible for the phosphorylation of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) sequences in TCR-CD3 complex as the earliest observable biochemical event during T-cell activation (10).…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

The coreceptor CD4 is expressed in distinct nanoclusters and does not colocalize with T-cell receptor and active protein tyrosine kinase p56lck

Roh

Lillemeier

Wang

et al. 2015

Self Cite

CD4 molecules on the surface of T lymphocytes greatly augment the sensitivity and activation process of these cells, but how it functions is not fully understood. Here we studied the spatial organization of CD4, and its relationship to T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) and the active form of Src kinase p56lck (Lck) using single and dual-color photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM). In nonactivated T cells, CD4 molecules are clustered in small protein islands, as are TCR and Lck. By dual-color imaging, we find that CD4, TCR, and Lck are localized in their separate clusters with limited interactions in the interfaces between them. Upon T-cell activation, the TCR and CD4 begin clustering together, developing into microclusters, and undergo a larger scale redistribution to form supramolecluar activation clusters (SMACs). CD4 and Lck localize in the inner TCR region of the SMAC, but this redistribution of disparate cluster structures results in enhanced segregation from each other. In nonactivated cells these preclustered structures and the limited interactions between them may serve to limit spontaneous and random activation events. However, the small sizes of these island structures also ensure large interfacial surfaces for potential interactions and signal amplification when activation is initiated. In the later activation stages, the increasingly larger clusters and their segregation from each other reduce the interfacial surfaces and could have a dampening effect. These highly differentiated spatial distributions of TCR, CD4, and Lck and their changes during activation suggest that there is a more complex hierarchy than previously thought.