2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503532112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coreceptor CD4 is expressed in distinct nanoclusters and does not colocalize with T-cell receptor and active protein tyrosine kinase p56lck

Abstract: CD4 molecules on the surface of T lymphocytes greatly augment the sensitivity and activation process of these cells, but how it functions is not fully understood. Here we studied the spatial organization of CD4, and its relationship to T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) and the active form of Src kinase p56lck (Lck) using single and dual-color photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM). In nonactivated T cells, CD4 molecules are clustered in small … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
67
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(86 reference statements)
5
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More CD3ζ molecules colocalized with Lck at 5 min than at later time points (Fig. 4D), supporting the notion that Lck may depart signaling clusters following early recruitment, resulting in an overall low level of colocalization as previously reported (39,40). Furthermore, although CD3ζ clusters contained pLat (Fig.…”
Section: Tcr Engagement Leads To Receptor Clustering Independently Ofsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…More CD3ζ molecules colocalized with Lck at 5 min than at later time points (Fig. 4D), supporting the notion that Lck may depart signaling clusters following early recruitment, resulting in an overall low level of colocalization as previously reported (39,40). Furthermore, although CD3ζ clusters contained pLat (Fig.…”
Section: Tcr Engagement Leads To Receptor Clustering Independently Ofsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…No difference in FRET E was observed between the PD-1T G ::PD-1T mCh negative control and our experimental CD3δT G ::CD4T mCh cells imaged on glass coverslips. This is consistent with data suggesting that CD4 and TCR do not pre-associate in an unengaged state (43). Adherence of CD3δT G ::CD4T mCh cells to glass coverslips functionalized with agonist pMHC resulted in a significant increase in CD3δT G ::CD4T mCh FRET E compared to cells on uncoated coverslips or the negative control cells, indicating that concurrent TCR and CD4 engagement of agonist pMHC positions CD3δ and CD4 in a close spatial relationship (Figure 1B).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the case of CD3δ::CD4 FRET, coordinate binding of CD4 and TCR to an agonist pMHC creates a transient mEGFP and mCherry pairing for a subset of TCR and CD4 molecules that engage pMHC on an immobile surface. This is because CD4 and the TCR have been shown by super resolution imaging to inhabit distinct membrane domains (43). Consequently, the number of TCRs within a membrane domain that are available to engage the same pMHC as a CD4 molecules in a distinct membrane domain appears to be physically limited to those that are located at the boundary of each membrane domain (43).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic experiments show that Lck plays a more important role than Fyn in TCR signaling (10). Lck can either be loaded on coreceptor CD4/CD8 or remain free (11)(12)(13). It is suggested that Lck molecules are all loaded on coreceptors in thymocytes (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested that Lck molecules are all loaded on coreceptors in thymocytes (12). However, superresolution imaging shows that CD4 and Lck localize in different nanodomains in mature T cells (13). Functionally, the coreceptor contributes to antigen sensitivity of T cells but is not essential for T-cell activation in mature T cells (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%