2011
DOI: 10.2108/zsj.28.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic Status of Three Types ofFejervarya cancrivorafrom Indonesia and Other Asian Countries Based on Morphological Observations and Crossing Experiments

Abstract: Although the crab-eating frog Fejervarya cancrivora is one of the most widely distributed species in Asian region, taxonomic relationships among different populations remain unclarified. In this study, we attempted to elucidate the taxonomic status of F. cancrivora from Indonesian and other Asian populations. Five populations of F. cancrivora from Selangor (Malaysia), Cianjur (Java, Indonesia), Trat (Thailand), Khulna (Bangladesh), and Makassar (Sulawesi, Indonesia) were morphologically observed and subjected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(32 reference statements)
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This endemic species, formerly considered conspecific with Fejervarya cancrivora but now afforded the status of an endemic Philippine species, due to its genetic distinctiveness (Kurniawan et al 2010, 2011), is common in coastal areas of NE Mindanao, brackish water swamps and mangroves, and river mouth estuarine areas. CAS specimens were collected in coastal areas, along riverbanks, four decades ago; an assessment of this species status in these heavily populated areas would be advisable.…”
Section: Species Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This endemic species, formerly considered conspecific with Fejervarya cancrivora but now afforded the status of an endemic Philippine species, due to its genetic distinctiveness (Kurniawan et al 2010, 2011), is common in coastal areas of NE Mindanao, brackish water swamps and mangroves, and river mouth estuarine areas. CAS specimens were collected in coastal areas, along riverbanks, four decades ago; an assessment of this species status in these heavily populated areas would be advisable.…”
Section: Species Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species identification was based mainly on morphological characteristics described by Dutta and Manamendra-Arachchi (1996), Chanda (2002), and Kabir et al (2009). We followed the species names adopted in the system of Frost (2011), with the exceptions of Fejervarya sahyadris (= Minervarya sahyadris), which is nested in the South Asian Fejervarya clade (Kuramoto et al, 2007;Kotaki et al, 2010), and F. moodiei, which is revived from the synonymy of F. cancrivora (corresponding to Mangrove type) (Kurniawan et al, 2011). Most dicroglossid specimens in the present study were collected from localities that differ from those of previous studies.…”
Section: Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large type of F. cancrivora was designated as the nominal F. cancrivora (Kotaki et al, 2010), while the mangrove and Sulawesi types were Hillis & Wilcox, (2005); b1) DQ347336, Bossuyt et al (2006); c1) AY322281, Roelants et al (2004); d1) EU979836, Che et al (2009); and e1) AY158705, Liu et al (2005). designated as F. moodiei and an undescribed species, respectively (Kurniawan et al 2011). Fejervarya moodiei from two Bangladeshi populations (Cox's Bazar and Khulna) formed a clade with two F. cancrivora mangrove type from Thailand and India (BPs = 97 for ML, 100 for NJ, ≥ 95% for BI, and sequence divergence = 0.2%-2.1%, average 1.07%).…”
Section: The Family Dicroglossidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…29) is a widespread, endemic estuarine specialist that can be found in a variety of coastal areas including brackish water swamps. Previously considered conspecific with the widespread Southeast Asian species Fejervarya cancrivora , recent genetic evidence suggests that the Philippine populations are genetically distinct; the available name for the Philippine population is Fejervarya moodiei (Kurniawan et al 2010, 2011). Widespread and common at most coastal areas throughout the Philippines, this species is clearly most appropriately considered “Least Concern” (LC; IUCN 2011).…”
Section: Species Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%