2009
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2101.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic revision and biogeography of the Tamarix-feeding Diorhabda elongata (Brullé, 1832) species group (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Galerucini) and analysis of their potential in biological control of Tamarisk

Abstract: The primarily Palearctic Diorhabda elongata species group is established for five Tamarix-feeding sibling species(tamarisk beetles): D. elongata (Brullé, 1832), D. carinata (Faldermann, 1837), D. sublineata (Lucas, 1849) REVISEDSTATUS, D. carinulata (Desbrochers, 1870), and D. meridionalis Berti & Rapilly, 1973 NEW STATUS. Diorhabdakoltzei ab. basicornis Laboissière, 1935 and D. e. deserticola Chen, 1961 are synonymized under D. carinulata NEWSYNONYMY. Illustrated keys utilize genitalia, including male end… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(186 reference statements)
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither did we Þnd any strong support for our alternative hypothesis that beetles should show the highest preference for, and the best performance on, the host species that predominate in the beetlesÕ areas of origin. For example, we did not Þnd an increased preference for or greater performance on T. parviflora in D. elongata, although the beetleÕs distribution range overlaps with T. parviflora in the Mediterranean region where T. ramosissima is absent (Baum 1978, Tracy andRobbins 2009). Similar results were found for D. carinata, although the distribution ranges of the two Tamarix species suggest that this subspecies should be better adapted to feed on T. ramosissima (Baum 1978, Gaskin andSchaal 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Neither did we Þnd any strong support for our alternative hypothesis that beetles should show the highest preference for, and the best performance on, the host species that predominate in the beetlesÕ areas of origin. For example, we did not Þnd an increased preference for or greater performance on T. parviflora in D. elongata, although the beetleÕs distribution range overlaps with T. parviflora in the Mediterranean region where T. ramosissima is absent (Baum 1978, Tracy andRobbins 2009). Similar results were found for D. carinata, although the distribution ranges of the two Tamarix species suggest that this subspecies should be better adapted to feed on T. ramosissima (Baum 1978, Gaskin andSchaal 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The beetles were originally collected in central Asia and released at many sites across nine states starting in 2001 (Dudley et al 2001, Lewis et al 2003. The beetles were referred to as a subspecies of D. elongata (D. e. deserticola), but the taxonomy has recently been updated, and the central Asia beetles should currently be referred to as D. carinulata (Desbrochers) (Tracy and Robbins 2009). In this paper, we will follow this new taxonomy of Diorhabda species group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tauber and Tauber 1976;Gomi and Takeda 1992), which may affect agent establishment. For example, the Tamarix-feeding beetle Diorhabda carinulata (Desbrochers) (Chrysomelidae) initially failed to establish in some areas in North America south of 38°N latitude probably due to the premature diapause during the summer rather than the fall, resulting in inadequate food reserves for overwintering (Bean et al 2007;Tracy and Robbins 2009). According to Diaz et al (2011), adults of G. boliviana enter diapause when exposed to short photoperiods (10:14 L:D h) and 22°C or 25°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%