2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic proposal for integration levels of management systems based on empirical evidence and derived corporate benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
94
0
18

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
94
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, businesses are increasingly integrating different management systems to reduce the duplication of managerial tasks and the economic losses that result from operating with multiple management system in parallel (Abad et al, 2014). From a strategic perspective, future research can address this point by evaluating if the effect of safety systems on performance is consistent in businesses that adopted other management systems.…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, businesses are increasingly integrating different management systems to reduce the duplication of managerial tasks and the economic losses that result from operating with multiple management system in parallel (Abad et al, 2014). From a strategic perspective, future research can address this point by evaluating if the effect of safety systems on performance is consistent in businesses that adopted other management systems.…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the level of integration we followed the taxonomic proposal of Abad et al (2014) which requires the identification of two crucial variables used to categorize the integration level of the IMS: the final documentation of the IMS, and the integration degree of the process map. In the former case, documentation is expressed as the number of written procedures of the IMS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of an ISO standard establishing the requirements of an IMS forces businesses to adopt "ad hoc" designs to deal with the integration of their management systems, following own integration strategies (Lopez-Fresno, 2010;Abad et al, 2014). Although the relatively high level of alignment and compatibility between standards, persistent dissimilarities between them still create problems to firms when designing the new management system (Matias & Coelho, 2002;Salomone, 2008;Santos, Mendes & Barbosa, 2011;De Oliveira, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations