2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40415-017-0428-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic and functional classifications of phytoplankton in tropical reservoirs with different trophic states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When analyzing the whole community at the species level, we found that mainly environmental factors drove the phytoplankton variation, as found in other studies (Beisner et al 2006 ; De Bie et al 2012 ; Padial et al 2014 ; Huszar et al 2015 ; Machado et al 2016 ; Santos et al 2016 ; Wojciechowski et al 2017 ; Santana et al 2018 ; Bortolini et al 2020 ). However, we also found that the influence of the environment (and space, as we will discuss below) depended on the functional features of the phytoplankton.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…When analyzing the whole community at the species level, we found that mainly environmental factors drove the phytoplankton variation, as found in other studies (Beisner et al 2006 ; De Bie et al 2012 ; Padial et al 2014 ; Huszar et al 2015 ; Machado et al 2016 ; Santos et al 2016 ; Wojciechowski et al 2017 ; Santana et al 2018 ; Bortolini et al 2020 ). However, we also found that the influence of the environment (and space, as we will discuss below) depended on the functional features of the phytoplankton.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…With regards to the mesotrophic reservoirs, the Itupararanga presented high cyanobacterial biomass and higher total biomass, mainly due to Mougeotia sp presenting numerous long filaments that increase the relative biomass of this species. Previous studies have associated this species with oligo-mesotrophic environments (Pacheco et al 2010;Santana et al 2018). It should be pointed out that monitoring the phytoplankton community structure, at the taxonomic level, is very sensitive at detecting environmental changes and is representative of the trophic state of the ecosystem, which is not always the case with total biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was also possible to detect how some researchers conduct comparative studies between the MBFG and other functional approaches traditionally applied to phytoplankton ecology in an attempt to seek the most efficient responses and greater predictive power (Izaguirre et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2013;Petar et al, 2014;Machado et al, 2015;Machado et al, 2016;Rangel et al, 2016;Lobo et al, 2018;Santana et al,, 2018;Bortolini et al, 2019;Cupertino et al, 2019). Different functional metrics have been used in the literature on phytoplankton, highlighting the MBFG (investigated in this article) and others as, for example, RFG, MFG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different functional classifications used for phytoplankton, the MBFG approach has been applied in other studies and aquatic ecosystems in different regions of the world (Fraisse et al, 2013;Segura et al, 2013;Bortolini et al, 2014;Bortolini & Bueno, 2017;Chen et al, 2015;Huszar et al, 2015;Mihaljević et al, 2013Mihaljević et al, , 2015Amorim et al, 2019;Magalhães et al, 2020). Besides, some studies have made comparisons by testing the efficiency of the morphological approach with other types of groupings (Izaguirre et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2013;Petar et al, 2014;Machado et al, 2015;Machado et al, 2016;Rangel et al, 2016;Lobo et al, 2018;Santana et al, 2018;Bortolini et al, 2019;Cupertino et al, 2019). Thus, it is recognized that classification based on morphology has been a relevant tool applied to freshwater phytoplankton ecological studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%