2016
DOI: 10.15446/cuad.econ.v35n69.54352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax shields, financial expenses and losses carried forward

Abstract: This article deals with the proper procedure for calculating Tax Shields (TS). The calculation includes cases where Losses Carried Forward are allowed and there is financial Other Income (OI). The procedure takes into account the magnitude of Adjusted Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EBITAdj) -that is, EBIT + OI - OE excluding Financial- compared with Financial Expenses (FE). This comparison defines three intervals and results for TS. If EBITAdj. < 0, TS will be 0; if EBITAdj. > 0 and less than FE, TS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculation of the value of tax shield is not only based on the interest, but in practice it is much more complicated. If the loss carried forward is allowed, according to Velez-Pareja [10] the tax shield does not reduce the tax liability in just one period, but its part is transferred to another future period when the loss is carried forward. In simplified terms, the value of tax shield is equal to the formula…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Valuation Of Tax Shieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of the value of tax shield is not only based on the interest, but in practice it is much more complicated. If the loss carried forward is allowed, according to Velez-Pareja [10] the tax shield does not reduce the tax liability in just one period, but its part is transferred to another future period when the loss is carried forward. In simplified terms, the value of tax shield is equal to the formula…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Valuation Of Tax Shieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two extreme positions: a) Modigliani and Miller (1963) propose discounting tax savings at the risk free rate; b) Ezzell (1980, 1985) propose discounting tax savings at the debt yield during the first year, and discounting at the cost of capital of an unleveraged firm " for the following years. There are also some middle ground positions (Taggart, 1991;Inselbag & Kaufold, 1997;Tham & Wonder, 2001;Tham & Velez Pareja, 2001;Tham & Wonder, 2002;Booth, 2002;Farber, Gillet & Szafarz, 2006;Cooper & Nyborg, 2006;Oded & Michel, 2007;Velez Pareja, 2016). It is held that tax savings are conditioned by the capital structure objective whether by maintaining a fixed debt present value (Modigliani & Miller, 1963) or by keeping a fixed debt/equity market ratio (Miles & Ezzell, 1980, 1985.…”
Section: Tax Savings Present Value As An Option Portfolio and The Edgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tax shield is also affected by the tax system and corporate and personal tax rate or loss carried forward, which affects the effective tax rate and tax burden [38][39][40].…”
Section: Emerging Markets Finance and Tax Shield Valuationmentioning
confidence: 99%