2016
DOI: 10.1257/pol.20140233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax Reforms and Intertemporal Shifting of Wage Income: Evidence from Danish Monthly Payroll Records

Abstract: Tax Reforms and Intertemporal Shifting of Wage Income: Evidence from Danish Monthly Payroll Records* Intertemporal shifting of wage income takes place when income earned in one tax year is paid out in another tax year in order to save taxes. Shifting has implications for the evaluation of the distortionary and distributional effects of taxes and may cause serious bias in empirical estimates of the elasticity of taxable income (ETI) for use in policy analysis. Based on new monthly payroll records for the univer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These reporting responses indicate that employees are aware of the allowance scheme' structure and shows the importance of proximity to the next higher bracket for the evasion decision. This pattern is also in accordance with recent evidence suggesting strong behavioral responses ('bunching') at salient discontinuities of the tax code (see, e.g., Saez 2010, Chetty et al 2011, Kleven and Waseem 2013, and Kreiner, Leth-Petersen and Skov 2014. Further, the solid line in Figure 2 displays the total number of cheaters in each bin (right scale of the figure).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…These reporting responses indicate that employees are aware of the allowance scheme' structure and shows the importance of proximity to the next higher bracket for the evasion decision. This pattern is also in accordance with recent evidence suggesting strong behavioral responses ('bunching') at salient discontinuities of the tax code (see, e.g., Saez 2010, Chetty et al 2011, Kleven and Waseem 2013, and Kreiner, Leth-Petersen and Skov 2014. Further, the solid line in Figure 2 displays the total number of cheaters in each bin (right scale of the figure).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…One reason for differences could be households changing the timing of income realizations (Kreiner et al 2013) or bringing forward or postponing deductions from one year to the next due to changing tax rates, regardless of any "real"…”
Section: Taxable Income Gross Income and Aggregate Deductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other channels that have been found to contribute to the ETI are, e.g., inter-and intra-temporal income shifting (Auerbach and Slemrod 1997, Kreiner et al 2013, Harju and Matikka 2013, le Maire and Schjerning 2013, Kreiner et al 2014, or tax non-compliance (Gorodnichenko et al 2009;Kleven et al 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the evidence is based on self-employed and/or high-income taxpayers given their larger range of opportunities to adjust their (taxable or gross) income (e.g. Kreiner et al (2014Kreiner et al ( , 2016, Le Maire and Schjerning (2013) or Harju and Matikka (2016)). Kleven et al (2011) and Kleven et al (2016) stress that third party information reporting influences the magnitude of behavioral responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%