2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10657-011-9247-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax rates and tax evasion: an empirical analysis of the long-run aspects in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods adopted by individual EU member states in order to estimate the VAT gap are summarised in the European Commission (2016). Some EU Member States such as the United Kingdom (HMRC, 2018), Sweden (Hansson and Wallberg, 2008), Slovakia (Novysedlák and Palkovičová, 2012), Romania (Romania Fiscal Council, 2011), Germany (Chang, Gebauer and Parsche, 2003and Parsche, 2008, and Italy (Chiarini, Marzano andSchneider, 2009, D'Agosto, Marigliani, Pisani, 2014) publish their estimates of the VAT gap. In other Member States, as for example in France, the VAT gap is calculated by the respective national statistical offices.…”
Section: Estimates Of Vat Evasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods adopted by individual EU member states in order to estimate the VAT gap are summarised in the European Commission (2016). Some EU Member States such as the United Kingdom (HMRC, 2018), Sweden (Hansson and Wallberg, 2008), Slovakia (Novysedlák and Palkovičová, 2012), Romania (Romania Fiscal Council, 2011), Germany (Chang, Gebauer and Parsche, 2003and Parsche, 2008, and Italy (Chiarini, Marzano andSchneider, 2009, D'Agosto, Marigliani, Pisani, 2014) publish their estimates of the VAT gap. In other Member States, as for example in France, the VAT gap is calculated by the respective national statistical offices.…”
Section: Estimates Of Vat Evasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect can be explained through activities impacting both, the government revenues, as well as the government expenditures (e.g. Toder, Nunns and Rosenberg, 2012;Schneider, 2004;Malička, Harčarikova, Gazda, 2012;Manolas, Rontos, Sfakianakis and Vavouras, 2013;Chianini, Marzano and Schneider, 2008). As Auerbach and Slemrod (1997) state the considerable fact should be that timing and other evasion behaviours are behaviours most responsive to tax changes, while changes in real productive activities are actually the least responsive.…”
Section: Online First 32 Results Of Sensitivity Analysis: the Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiarini et al (2013) No que tange as análises para o Gráfico 1, observa-se, em suma, que tanto nesta seção quanto na literatura, a alíquota de impostos e evasão fiscal são altamente correlacionadas e positivas, sinalizando necessidades de mu-danças na estrutura do fisco como possível caminho para a redução da sonegação.…”
Section: Gráfico 1 -Relação Entre T E H -L Dos Países Selecionadosunclassified