Tax Potential vs. Tax Effort: A Cross-Country Analysis of Armenia's Stubbornly Low Tax Collection

Abstract

This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate.Despite recording double digit growth since 2000, Armenia's tax-to-GDP ratio has been fairly stable at about 14½ percent. This paper catalogues a range of factors that may account for Armenia's stubbornly for tax collection by benchmarking Armenia's tax-to-GDP against some comparator countries and conducting an extensive econometric study of the main determinants of tax collection. We find empirical support for the hypothesis that the persistence of Armenia's low tax-GDP ratio can be traced to persistence of weak institutions and a large shadow economy. The gap between the potential and actual tax collection in Armenia could be as high as 6½ percent of GDP. We conclude with some policy recommendations that, if adopted, can boost revenue buoyancy. JEL Classification Numbers: H2, H3, P52

Access-for-all to financial services: Non-resources tax revenue-harnessing opportunities in developing countries

“…Turning to the control variables, the results indicate that the level of development measured by the real GDP per capita and the quality of the institution appear to be relevant determinants of non-resources tax ratio in developing countries and are positively and significantly associated with tax ratio. These findings are consistent with previous evidences (Pessino and Fenochietto, 2010;Fenochietto and Pessino, 2013;Crivelli and Gupta, 2014;Davoodi and Grigorian, 2007); Gupta, 2007;Gordon and Li, 2009;Clist and Morrissey, 2011;Fenochietto and Pessino, 2013; Feger and Asafu-Adjaye, 2014) that countries' tax capacity is related to their level of development and good quality of institution is favorable to greater tax revenue collection. The results also confirm our hypothesis of non-linearity between the level of development and the capacity captured by the negative a significant coefficient associated with the squared of real GDP per capita.…”

Determinants of Property Tax Revenue: Lessons from Empirical Analysis

“…Within this frame, lax behavior by states in mobilizing own revenue, most credibly through property tax, tends to be unintendedly compensated by the increased magnitude of equalization or other types of redistributive transfers. 14 The broader policy relevancy that we would venture to highlight here is: The efficiency in property taxation is directly related to or dependent upon the structure of the fiscal decentralization.…”

Effort fiscal en Afrique subsaharienne : les résultats d’une nouvelle base de données

“…A second generation of empirical works outlined the pivotal role of inflation, institutional quality, education, political stability, external aid, and financial development in addition to the previous economic factors (Tanzi and Davoodi, 1997, Grigorian and Davoodi, 2007, Gupta, 2007, Gordon and Li, 2009, Clist and Morrissey, 2011, Fenochietto and Pessino, 2013, Feger and Asafu-Adjaye, 2014.…”