2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2005.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax evasion and income source: A comparative experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(58 reference statements)
4
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies examining the effect of culture on tax compliance have therefore attempted to examine the behavior of individuals from different cultural backgrounds when placed in a similar environment. One strand of literature has compared tax evasion in similar laboratory experiments across two or three countries (for example, Alm, Sanchez, and de Juan 1995;Cummings, Martinez-Vazquez, McKee, and Torgler 2009;Gërxhani and Schram 2006;Lefebvre, Pestieau, Riedl, and Villeval 2011). These studies generally find differences across countries in tax evasion despite similar subject pools and experimental protocols.…”
Section: Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examining the effect of culture on tax compliance have therefore attempted to examine the behavior of individuals from different cultural backgrounds when placed in a similar environment. One strand of literature has compared tax evasion in similar laboratory experiments across two or three countries (for example, Alm, Sanchez, and de Juan 1995;Cummings, Martinez-Vazquez, McKee, and Torgler 2009;Gërxhani and Schram 2006;Lefebvre, Pestieau, Riedl, and Villeval 2011). These studies generally find differences across countries in tax evasion despite similar subject pools and experimental protocols.…”
Section: Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Alm, McClelland, and Schulze (1999) show that the social norm falls, often collapsing virtually to zero, when there is a so-cial expression via group selection of the fiscal regime of a willingness to tolerate tax evasion, such as a majority vote in favor of reduced enforcement on detected evasion; however, they also find that the norm can be improved (and compliance can be increased) when there is a social expression of an unwillingness to tolerate tax evasion. Torgler (2003) and Gërxhani and Schram (2006) also find experimental evidence that that the social norm can be affected by the institutions that face individuals, by individuals' attitudes toward these institutions, and by individual participation in the selection of those institutions.…”
Section: Testing the Expanded Model Using Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tax evasion may also result from the fact that tax law is complicated (Kosonen and Ropponen 2015). Gërxhani and Schram (2006) give participants a choice between two options for making money. One is more profitable in expectation, but tax evasion is impossible.…”
Section: C) Tax Evasionmentioning
confidence: 99%