2007
DOI: 10.1002/qua.21404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tautomerism of monochalcogenosilanoic acids CH3Si(O)XH (X = S, Se, Te) in the gas phase and in the polar and aprotic solution: An ab initio computational investigation

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Computational investigations by an ab initio molecular orbital method (HF and MP2) with the 6-311ϩG(d,p) and 6-311ϩϩG(2df, 2pd) basis sets on the tautomerism of three monochalcogenosilanoic acids CH 3 Si(AO)XH (X ϭ S, Se, and Te) in the gas phase and a polar and aprotic solution tetrahydrofuran (THF) was undertaken. Calculated results show that the silanol forms CH 3 Si(AX)OH are much more stable than the silanone forms CH 3 Si(AO)XH in the gas-phase, which is different from the monochalcogenocarboxy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence the formation of the P−E bond is less favorable than the formation of a Si−E bond. Note that our calculated reaction energies are comparable to the previously reported bond‐dissociation energies for Si=S (112.8), Si=Se (95.5), and Si=Te (77.2 kcal mol −1 ) bonds in CH 3 Si(=E)OH compounds (E=S, Se, Te) at the MP2/6–311++G(2df, 2pd)//MP2/6–311+G(d, p) level of theory . The Si−S bond is the strongest among Si−E bonds in 1 – 3 , which is in accordance with the experimental observation that the regeneration of parent molecule A could not be achieved when 1 is treated with the L′Al (L′=HC{(CMe)(2,6‐ i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 N)} 2 ) (Scheme ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Hence the formation of the P−E bond is less favorable than the formation of a Si−E bond. Note that our calculated reaction energies are comparable to the previously reported bond‐dissociation energies for Si=S (112.8), Si=Se (95.5), and Si=Te (77.2 kcal mol −1 ) bonds in CH 3 Si(=E)OH compounds (E=S, Se, Te) at the MP2/6–311++G(2df, 2pd)//MP2/6–311+G(d, p) level of theory . The Si−S bond is the strongest among Si−E bonds in 1 – 3 , which is in accordance with the experimental observation that the regeneration of parent molecule A could not be achieved when 1 is treated with the L′Al (L′=HC{(CMe)(2,6‐ i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 N)} 2 ) (Scheme ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Ein zweiter Hydrolyseschritt liefert den monomeren Silaheterocyclus 9 mit einer OH‐ und einer SeH‐Gruppe. Hierauf folgt eine 1,3‐H‐Wanderung vom Selen‐ zu einem Stickstoffatom unter Bildung der Selensilacarbaminsäure 10 7. Zum Schluss wird durch Kondensation zweier Moleküle 10 das sauerstoffverbrückte 7 gebildet.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…The hydrolysis of both the racemic and the meso forms of 6 involves an initial ring opening of the central Si/Se heterocycle by protonation of the selenium atom and nucleophilic attack at the second silicon atom to give compound 8 . A second hydrolysis step affords the monomeric OH/SeH‐ligated silicon‐containing heterocycle 9 , followed by 1,3‐hydrogen transfer from the selenium atom to one nitrogen atom to give the selenosilacarbamic acid 10 7. In the final step, condensation of two molecules of 10 affords the oxygen‐bridged compound 7 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%