2017
DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tattooing or not? A review of current practice and outcomes for laparoscopic colonic resection following endoscopy at a tertiary care centre

Abstract: Background: Because small colonic tumours may not be visualized or palpated during laparoscopy, location of the lesion must be identified before surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the current recommendation of endoscopic tattooing of lesions prior to laparoscopic colonic resections.Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic resection for a colonic lesion at a single tertiary institution between 2013 and 2015 were identified for chart review. Results:I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 The safety and efficacy of endoscopic tattooing have been reported in many studies, but its routine use has still not been achieved. 4,5,8,15 The lack of endoscopic tattooing may result in significant difficulty in identifying the lesion of interest and may ultimately result in inadequate oncological clearances, perioperative difficulties and an increase in the rate of conversion of open surgeries. 4,5 In spite of such concerns, the real incidence of not tattooing by the endoscopist when lesions suspicious for malignancy are identified remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…18 The safety and efficacy of endoscopic tattooing have been reported in many studies, but its routine use has still not been achieved. 4,5,8,15 The lack of endoscopic tattooing may result in significant difficulty in identifying the lesion of interest and may ultimately result in inadequate oncological clearances, perioperative difficulties and an increase in the rate of conversion of open surgeries. 4,5 In spite of such concerns, the real incidence of not tattooing by the endoscopist when lesions suspicious for malignancy are identified remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, all colonic lesions that appear to be malignant should be tattooed during endoscopy to improve surgical localisation. 5,16,19 Tattoo endoscopy is a safe and effective method for preoperative tumour localisation. [4][5][6][7][8]11 A need for improvement and uniformity of tattoo practice among endoscopists despite the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme guidelines is important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Colonoscopy failed to locate the tumour in four (21%) cases and located the tumour incorrectly at least 6.5% of cases in other series , which is similar to our series. Tattooing cannot be seen in laparoscopic surgery in at least 12–21% of cases . Therefore, CTC is a good solution in all these circumstances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%