2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01575-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task specificity impacts dual-task interference in older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, participants' MoS variability ranged from 0.4 to 3.1 cm, which is not larger than the variability reported by McCrum et al ( 2020 ), which ranged from ~1 to ~3.5 cm and was measured over 10 consecutive unperturbed steps. This, and recent observations by Fallahtafti et al ( 2021 ) showing that treadmill walking leads to lower MoS variability compared with overground walking, suggest that the within-subjects MoS variability might not have been overestimated but rather underestimated, which may explain the large number of participants who did not return to stable gait by the 15th step in this study ( n = 14 following the first slip). Careful considerations should be made concerning the number of steps used to determine the MoS variability in future studies, particularly when transferring from treadmill to overground tasks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, participants' MoS variability ranged from 0.4 to 3.1 cm, which is not larger than the variability reported by McCrum et al ( 2020 ), which ranged from ~1 to ~3.5 cm and was measured over 10 consecutive unperturbed steps. This, and recent observations by Fallahtafti et al ( 2021 ) showing that treadmill walking leads to lower MoS variability compared with overground walking, suggest that the within-subjects MoS variability might not have been overestimated but rather underestimated, which may explain the large number of participants who did not return to stable gait by the 15th step in this study ( n = 14 following the first slip). Careful considerations should be made concerning the number of steps used to determine the MoS variability in future studies, particularly when transferring from treadmill to overground tasks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Vale destacar que, embora o treinamento de DT seja uma estratégia eficaz para melhorar a capacidade cognitiva e motora da população idosa é fundamental que as tarefas sejam adequadamente planejadas, pois o tipo de tarefa cognitiva concorrente pode influenciar na interferência da DT. 68 Além do mais, é necessário que os participantes apresentem um mínimo de desempenho cognitivo, bem como que a priorização das variáveis seja considerada, e que exista a priorização das atividades de transferência. 69 Outro aspecto a considerar é que o treinamento de DT seja realizado por um tempo superior a quatro semanas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…This additive effect increases cognitive demands; a result of task demands and the required coordination processes (Son et al, 2019 ). As such, the ability to manage the interference of, and switching between, conflicting tasks is of high importance during dual-/multi-task performance (Fallahtafti et al, 2020 ). Failure to do so can result in a performance decrement; termed the dual-task interference effect (Schmidt and Lee, 2013 ).…”
Section: Inclusion Of Dual-/multi-taskingmentioning
confidence: 99%