2014
DOI: 10.1310/tsr2104-347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task Matters: Influence of Different Cognitive Tasks on Cognitive-Motor Interference During Dual-Task Walking in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Abstract: CMI pattern in chronic stroke survivors differs significantly with type of cognitive task. Gradual cognitive decline with chronicity of condition might have a role in altering the CMI pattern in this population. Future studies of DT interventions for stroke survivors might benefit from incorporating working memory tasks in their protocols.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
47
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that the more complex the associated task, the greater the interference with the performance of the primary task [18], for example, talking while walking reduces gait speed [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the more complex the associated task, the greater the interference with the performance of the primary task [18], for example, talking while walking reduces gait speed [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most typically, studies do operationalize the primary task as ambulation. The variables combined with walking have a broad range, and have included: 1) various types of secondary task distracter, or "modes" of distraction: cognitive, visual, auditory, or manual [42,43]; 2) different methodologies (testing each task as a single-task prior to combining) [43,[44][45][46][47]; 3) considerations of task complexity/novelty and reality (meaning how contrived or realitybased the task should or can be) [42,47], and 4) different forms of walking (direction, or speed) including backwards, self-selected, and maximal efforts [42,47]. In all, the most common investigations in dual task literature are dual task cost (DTC) or dual task effect (DTE), being the statistical reflection of change in performance in the primary task from single-task to dual task conditions.…”
Section: Influence On Gaitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, the most common investigations in dual task literature are dual task cost (DTC) or dual task effect (DTE), being the statistical reflection of change in performance in the primary task from single-task to dual task conditions. In many recent studies, scientists have measured cost for walking and the distracter, in an attempt to investigate the relative cognitive participation for each stimulus [42,[44][45][46][47]. Well-established tests that are intended to reflect DT capacity include versions of the Timed Up and Go test, specifically the cognitive and manual dual task versions (CTUG and TUG-m).…”
Section: Influence On Gaitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations