Task Difficulty Modulates the Disrupting Effects of Oral Respiration on Visual Search Performance

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that oral respiration may disturb cognitive function and health. The present study investigated whether oral respiration negatively affects visual attentional processing during a visual search task. Participants performed a visual search task in the following three breathing conditions: wearing a nasal plug, wearing surgical tape over their mouths, or no modification (oral vs. nasal vs. control). The participants searched for a target stimulus within different set sizes of distractors in three search conditions (orientation vs colour vs conjunction). Experiment 1 did not show any effect due to respiration. Experiment 2 rigorously manipulated the search efficiency and found that participants required more time to find a poorly discriminable target during oral breathing compared with other breathing styles, which was due to the heightened intercept under this condition. Because the intercept is an index of pre-search sensory processing or motor response in visual search, such cognitive processing was likely disrupted by oral respiration. These results suggest that oral respiration and attentional processing during inefficient visual search share a common cognitive resource.

Change-detection training and its effects on visual processing skills

“…Performance on the conjunction search task is captured by a baseline processing time (often referred to as the intercept of a linear regression model) and the rate of processing (often referred to as the slope of a linear regression model). While the rate of processing is an indicator for search efficiency that reflects the rate of attentional shifting between items for example, the baseline processing time is assumed to represent components that are not search related such as perceptual processes and motor-related response processes 54 , 55 . Figure 8 illustrates that the baseline processing time is different between sessions and groups which was confirmed by a significant group difference of the intercept as shown with the ANCOVA.…”

Permutation tests are robust and powerful at 0.5% and 5% significance levels

“…For example, the ubiquity of the t-test in psychology is evidenced in various studies to compare reaction times(Yoshimura, Yonemitsu, Marmolejo-Ramos, Ariga, & Yamada, 2019). A nonparametric test like the Brunner-Munzel test(Brunner & Munzel, 2000), is representative of progress in statistical science and, although yet less known by researchers, is covered in recent statistics textbooks (e.g.,Wilcox, 2017) and research articles (e.g., seeMarmolejo-Ramos et al, 2013 for an application of this test).…”