1988
DOI: 10.1300/j075v09n02_06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task Clarification and Individual Performance Posting for Improving Cleaning in a Student-Managed University Bar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include antecedent-based interventions such as task clarification (Anderson, Crowell, Hantula, & Siroky, 1988), training (Geller, Eason, Phillips, & Pierson, 1980), goal-setting (Wilk & Redmon, 1990), and prompting (Austin, Hatfield, Grindle, & Bailey, 1993), as well as consequence-based interventions such as feedback (see Alvero, Bucklin, & Austin, 2001 for a review) and performance-contingent pay (see Bucklin & Dickinson, 2001 for a review). Although these interventions are common in the OBM literature, they are often combined into multi-component or package interventions and are less often examined individually.…”
Section: The Effects Of Task Clarification Visual Prompts and Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include antecedent-based interventions such as task clarification (Anderson, Crowell, Hantula, & Siroky, 1988), training (Geller, Eason, Phillips, & Pierson, 1980), goal-setting (Wilk & Redmon, 1990), and prompting (Austin, Hatfield, Grindle, & Bailey, 1993), as well as consequence-based interventions such as feedback (see Alvero, Bucklin, & Austin, 2001 for a review) and performance-contingent pay (see Bucklin & Dickinson, 2001 for a review). Although these interventions are common in the OBM literature, they are often combined into multi-component or package interventions and are less often examined individually.…”
Section: The Effects Of Task Clarification Visual Prompts and Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment satisfaction was included because it is commonly an element of quality monitoring systems in addiction treatment programs (National Treatment Center Study, 2005). By monitoring therapeutic alliance and treatment satisfaction, the PF system allows clinicians to assess the interim effectiveness of their efforts and to make modifications if needed (Anderson, Crowell, Hantula, & Siroky, 1988;Deming, 1986;Juran & Godfrey, 1999). Additionally, the regular assessment of these dimensions, in itself, may influence clinician behavior by signaling that alliance and satisfaction are priorities of the organization (Alvero, Bucklin, & Austin, 2001;Berwick, Godfrey, & Roessner, 1990;Nicol & Hantula, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task clarification and verbal feedback have been jointly used to increase correct closing-time behaviors and cleaning behaviors in a university bar (Anderson, Crowell, Hantula, & Siroky, 1988), grocery stores (Shier, Rae, & Austin, 2003), and restaurants (Austin, Weatherly, & Gravina. 2005).…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%