1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90519-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tarnish and corrosion with the use of intraoral magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, many studies have been performed to extend the life of magnetic attachments used to retain dental prostheses [10,14,17]. In the present study, we examined Dyna ES magnetic attachments in order to investigate the corrosion-crack mechanism involved in these attachments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, many studies have been performed to extend the life of magnetic attachments used to retain dental prostheses [10,14,17]. In the present study, we examined Dyna ES magnetic attachments in order to investigate the corrosion-crack mechanism involved in these attachments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic attachments offers many benefits including the following: they simplify the preparation of prostheses; they pose little stress to the abutment teeth when the prosthesis is inserted or removed; they do not transmit too much lateral force, which is harmful to abutment teeth due to a slight absorptive force induced in the horizontal direction; they offer excellent cosmetic appearance; and they can be handled easily by the patient. However, Drago [10] identified problems related with clinically used magnetic retention devices, including corrosion, discoloration, and a consequent decrease in retention force due to demagnetization. He also reported that patient satisfaction with these devices is not high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cased magnet is housed inside the prosthesis, whereas the keeper is cemented to the root of the abutment tooth or screwed onto the implant. However, for those systems the application is limited so far due to the low corrosion resistance of NdFeB and SmCo magnets in contact with saliva, their low biocompatibility and additional galvanic corrosion effects in contact with the stainless steel or other types of dental alloys [5][6][7][8][9]. FePt alloys are considered as being much more corrosion resistant hard magnetic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%