2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting therapy for esophageal cancer in patients aged 70 and over

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a recent study by Furlong et al 43 reported on their favorable results with a wait-and-see approach for high-risk patients with esophageal cancer, with a complete clinical response after nCRT. Taken together, these results strengthen our willingness to formally test a wait-and-see approach in patients with esophageal cancer otherwise fit to undergo resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a recent study by Furlong et al 43 reported on their favorable results with a wait-and-see approach for high-risk patients with esophageal cancer, with a complete clinical response after nCRT. Taken together, these results strengthen our willingness to formally test a wait-and-see approach in patients with esophageal cancer otherwise fit to undergo resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After nCRT plus surgery, about one‐third of all patients (49 per cent of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 23 per cent of those with adenocarcinoma) have a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen, meaning that no viable tumour cells can be found. Therefore, an active surveillance approach could be applied in selected patients with both histological subtypes. During active surveillance after nCRT, clinical investigations are performed to detect residual or recurrent cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survival was similar for those undergoing an operation vs. surveillance: the whole cohort with cCRs had a median survival of 47 months (61 months for those undergoing an upfront surgery and 29 months for those who had a salvage operation) versus 46 months for the subset that did not undergo resection. Despite this being a very small retrospective study subject to treatment selection bias, there is a suggestion that overall there may not be a survival advantage to a non-selective progression to surgery in this particular population (42).…”
Section: Existing Evidencementioning
confidence: 82%