2018
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.01.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance versus esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after induction chemoradiation

Abstract: There currently exists an area of controversy in treatment of esophageal cancer for patients who have an apparent clinical complete response (cCR) after induction chemoradiation. A standard treatment is to offer these patients an esophagectomy, but increasingly there is interest from both the patient and provider for active surveillance with so-called "salvage" esophagectomies for local recurrence as an alternative treatment paradigm. In this article, we review the existing evidence that stakeholders should co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. If complete metabolic response follows neoadjuvant treatment, then an active surveillance strategy can be considered (2). However, with the commonly used metabolic imaging methods, such as positron-emitted tomography/computed tomography, it is difficult to differentiate between inflammation and residual malignancy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. If complete metabolic response follows neoadjuvant treatment, then an active surveillance strategy can be considered (2). However, with the commonly used metabolic imaging methods, such as positron-emitted tomography/computed tomography, it is difficult to differentiate between inflammation and residual malignancy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, despite the standard treatment for those patients that experience recurrence after pCR implies esophagectomy, there is increasing interest from both the patient and provider for active surveillance with so-called "salvage" esophagectomies for local recurrence as an alternative treatment paradigm. 36 Therefore, the identification of recurrence markers is of primary interest. In the present work, we observed that CD38, CD69, and Tbet mRNA relative levels were significantly lower in patients with mucosal complete response (TRG1) who recurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 37 These data and those obtained in our series seem to suggest that CD38 and CD69 expression in the healthy mucosa surrounding the cancer or in the site of the previous cancer might reveal the immune status of the esophageal mucosa microenvironment, which is directly related to the immune tumor response. Therefore, since the clinical decision-making in this specific patient population includes the accuracy of post-induction clinical restaging, 36 these markers might further be tested in a large prospective trial as predictors of recurrence after mucosal complete response. In fact, with improved diagnostic accuracy, nonsurgical treatment can become a solid option for patients identified as cCR after treatment administered in a neoadjuvant setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only eradication of the infectious tissue enables the anastomosis to recover. But management of this complication still remains controversial (16,23), some surgeons prefer conservative methods and some prefer reoperation. According to published data, mortality of patients who received reoperation is pretty high (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%