Targeting the optimum steam system for power generation with increased flexibility in the steam power island design

Botros, Barbara B.; Brisson, J. G.

doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.045

Cited by 25 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is a limited number of published studies compared to postcombustion and emerging technologies on commercial systems based on CO 2 separation by MDEA (Alliance, 2012), (Atsonios et al, 2013), (Fluor Daniel Inc., 2000), (Lozza and Chiesa, 2002a,b), , (Nord and Bolland, 2011a,b), (Nord et al, 2009a,b), (Romano et al, 2010). This is not the case for CO 2 capture employed in IGCC, where there are several published works (Botros and Brisson, 2011), (Botros and Brisson, 2013), (Chen and Rubin, 2009), (Cormos, 2011), (Cormos, 2012), (Gatti et al, 2014), (Gazzani et al, 2013a,b), (Giuffrida et al, 2012a,b), (Grol and Yang, 2009), (Kunze and Spliethoff, 2010), (Kunze et al, 2011), (Majoumerd and Assadi, 2014), (Majoumerd et al, 2012), (Manzolini et al, 2013a,b), (Martelli et al, 2011), (NETL, 2010.…”

Section: Current Status Pre-combustion Co 2 Capture For Ccs In Power mentioning

confidence: 82%

“…From a technical point of view, SEWGS is now ready to move to the next development level, which is a pilot plant installation with a capacity of 35 t CO 2 per day (Jansen et al, 2013). Considering an improved heat recovery integration, advanced solutions are presented in (Botros and Brisson, 2011), (Botros and Brisson, 2013) and (Martelli et al, 2011). Alongside improvements linked to the CO 2 capture process, IGCC can benefit of any advancements in hydrogen-fuelled GT.…”

Section: Advancements In Igcc Plant With Co 2 Capture and Commercial mentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pre-combustion CO2 capture

Jansen

Gazzani

Manzolini

et al. 2015

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

297

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper, which is part of a special issue of the International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, gives an overview of the latest achievements in the pre-combustion decarbonisation route for the production of electricity with CO2 capture. Pre-combustion technologies applied to two different fuels are considered, natural gas and coal, since they cover most of electricity production from fossil fuels worldwide. The work first discusses in detail the different sections in which a power plant with pre-combustion CO2 capture can be divided. For each section, the available technologies with corresponding advantages and disadvantages are presented. Next, the plant lay-outs for natural gas and coal proposed in literature, including heat & mass balances and the economic assessment, are discussed. In general, research activity in pre-combustion decarbonisation for power production focused more on coal than on natural gas-based plant since in the latter case the plant complexity and costs are not competitive with post-combustion CO2 capture, which is a technology on the verge of commercialization. Finally the paper briefly discusses pre-combustion CO2 capture in industry especially those projects where CO2 is captured and stored or used for EOR

show abstract

Section: Current Status Pre-combustion Co 2 Capture For Ccs In Power mentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Advancements In Igcc Plant With Co 2 Capture and Commercial mentioning

confidence: 97%

Pre-combustion CO2 capture

Jansen

Gazzani

Manzolini

et al. 2015

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

297

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use of individual process Grand Composite Curves (GCC) for integration of different processes in a TSA study is further discussed by Bandyopadhyay et al [31]. The importance of including sensible heat when matching process and steam systems in TSA was demonstrated by Botros and Brisson [32].…”

Section: Pinch Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Framework methodology for increased energy efficiency and renewable feedstock integration in industrial clusters

Hackl

Harvey

2013

Applied Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Energy intensive industries, such as the bulk chemical industry, are facing major challenges and adopting strategies to face these challenges. This paper investigates options for clusters of chemical process plants to decrease their energy and emission footprints. There is a wide range of technologies and process integration opportunities available for achieving these objectives, including (i) decreasing fossil fuel and electricity demand by increasing heat integration within individual processes and across the total cluster site; (ii) replacing fossil feedstocks with renewables and biorefinery integration with the existing cluster; (iii) increasing external utilization of excess process heat wherever possible. This paper presents an overview of the use of process integration methods for development of chemical clusters. Process simulation, pinch analysis, Total Site Analysis (TSA) and exergy concepts are combined in a holistic approach to identify opportunities to improve energy efficiency and integrate renewable feedstocks within such clusters. The methodology is illustrated by application to a chemical cluster in Stenungsund on the West Coast of Sweden consisting of 5 different companies operating 6 process plants. The paper emphasizes and quantifies the gains that can be made by adopting a total-site approach for targeting energy efficiency measures within the cluster and when investigating integration opportunities for advanced biorefinery concepts compared to restricting the analysis to the individual constituent plants. The holistic approach applied highlights the significant potential improvement to energy and emissions footprints that can be achieved when applying a total site approach.

show abstract

“…The total site analysis method presented by Dhole and Linnhoff (1993) and Klemes et al (1997) are also used for steam cycle design, but they are geared mainly for cogeneration and do not take into account the sensible heating in the production and use of steam which is a significant proportion of the heat in a power station. Kapil et al (2010) and Botros and Brisson II (2010) included the sensible heat required for the steam production. They calculated the mass flowrates through the steam cycle using a bottom-up or iterative procedure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%