2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting Global Protected Area Expansion for Imperiled Biodiversity

Abstract: Meeting international targets for expanding protected areas could simultaneously contribute to species conservation, but only if the distribution of threatened species informs the future establishment of protected areas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
485
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 484 publications
(505 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
485
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Their flat peaks are rich in restricted range endemic species (McPherson, 2008), and connect with the Canaima and Mount Roraima National Parks in Venezuela and Brazil. These highlands are shown to be critical to achieving conservation targets in Guyana, because they exhibit high selection frequency, and in addition, they are shown to be important in global spatial conservation prioritisations (Pollock et al, 2017;Venter et al, 2014). So alongside affirming the biodiversity value of these areas, our study provides maps at a suitable scale for use by policy makers to delineate protected area boundaries.…”
Section: Je Bicknell Et Al B Io Lo G Ic a L C O N S E R V A T Io Nmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their flat peaks are rich in restricted range endemic species (McPherson, 2008), and connect with the Canaima and Mount Roraima National Parks in Venezuela and Brazil. These highlands are shown to be critical to achieving conservation targets in Guyana, because they exhibit high selection frequency, and in addition, they are shown to be important in global spatial conservation prioritisations (Pollock et al, 2017;Venter et al, 2014). So alongside affirming the biodiversity value of these areas, our study provides maps at a suitable scale for use by policy makers to delineate protected area boundaries.…”
Section: Je Bicknell Et Al B Io Lo G Ic a L C O N S E R V A T Io Nmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Butchart et al, 2015;Larsen et al, 2011;Pollock et al, 2017;Venter et al, 2014), and these provide broad insights into the optimal locations for future protection at the international scale. However, as Aichi Target 11 is implemented at the national-level (CBD, 2010), and as this is the scale most relevant for land-use policy development and delivery, national-scale spatial conservation prioritisations are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the more intuitive options is to concentrate efforts in places where multiple conservation benefits can be achieved simultaneously whenever such multi-objective hotspots are ecologically appropriate and socio-economically equitable (Beger et al, 2015;Kark et al, 2009;Venter et al, 2014). Since the World Heritage Convention was adopted in 1972, the World Heritage List has continually evolved and is growing steadily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two analyses represent different interpretations of the CBD target 11 [1,3,6]. Except for the country-specific area coverage targets, both sets of targets are 'globalized' in the sense that they were achieved without considering national borders.…”
Section: Methods (A) Protected Area Expansion By 2020mentioning
confidence: 99%