2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted T cell receptor gene editing provides predictable T cell product function for immunotherapy

Abstract: Summary Adoptive transfer of T cells expressing a transgenic T cell receptor (TCR) has the potential to revolutionize immunotherapy of infectious diseases and cancer. However, the generation of defined TCR-transgenic T cell medicinal products with predictable in vivo function still poses a major challenge and limits broader and more successful application of this “living drug.” Here, by studying 51 different TCRs, we show that conventional genetic engineering by viral transduc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technology places the transgenic TCR into the endogenous gene locus, resulting in physiological transgene expression, and simultaneously completely removes the endogenous TCR, leading to unbiased and complete reexpression of transgenic TCRs. Because the recipient T cells for engineering are the same for all TCRs, this approach allows for a systematic comparison of TCR functionality, irrespective of the phenotype of the original cells from which the TCR was isolated ( 62 , 63 ). For reexpression, we chose the eight most abundant TCRs across all samples [human TCRs (hTCRs) E14, E2, E4, E5, E23, E49, E13, and E74].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology places the transgenic TCR into the endogenous gene locus, resulting in physiological transgene expression, and simultaneously completely removes the endogenous TCR, leading to unbiased and complete reexpression of transgenic TCRs. Because the recipient T cells for engineering are the same for all TCRs, this approach allows for a systematic comparison of TCR functionality, irrespective of the phenotype of the original cells from which the TCR was isolated ( 62 , 63 ). For reexpression, we chose the eight most abundant TCRs across all samples [human TCRs (hTCRs) E14, E2, E4, E5, E23, E49, E13, and E74].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TI of the EF1α construct generated more potent T cell activation than the construct driven by the endogenous TCRα promoter while also resulting in less exhausted T cells. Recently, Müller and colleagues ( 65 ) showed that the orthotopic integration of viral specific TCR genes leads to homogeneous TCR expression and more predictable in vivo activity of engineered cells, when compared to retrovirally transduced, edited T cells. Our data suggest that optimal activation of the TCR is critical and dependent on genomic context as well as the right promoter strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sources of T cell heterogeneity can result when T cells are genetically modified, such as by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, which can produce mixed edited and unedited cells ( Rupp et al, 2017 ). Genome editing procedures may also be used to reduce heterogeneity in modified T cells ( Muller et al, 2021 ). An integrated readout of T cell activation combined with cancer cell death could be used to determine whether phenotypic differences that influence T cell activation result in altered T cell-mediated cytotoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%