2015
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted resequencing analysis of 31 genes commonly mutated in myeloid disorders in serial samples from myelodysplastic syndrome patients showing disease progression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with recent studies of myelodysplastic syndromes 12 and AML patients. 13 In two recent NGS studies of 197 MPNs in chronic phase 6 and 33 post-MPN AMLs…”
Section: Letters To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These results are in agreement with recent studies of myelodysplastic syndromes 12 and AML patients. 13 In two recent NGS studies of 197 MPNs in chronic phase 6 and 33 post-MPN AMLs…”
Section: Letters To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In addition to functional significance, recent sequencing technology also uncovered clonal dynamics based on detailed information of mutated clone size. In particular, multiple samples tested at serial time points in each case can conclude acquisition timing of each mutation, clonal architecture, and intratumor heterogeneity in myelodysplasia [4,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 The data are also reminiscent to other myeloid neoplasms and their clonal diversity, in which mutations in RUNX1, N/KRAS or IDH2 were also identified as late events and drivers for disease progression. 19,[28][29][30][31] Of interest, no significant increase in clone size was observed for mutations in TET2 or SRSF2, although they represent early mutations in the multistep pathogenesis of SM, 8 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, 32 or MDS. 19 These results suggest that the extensive clinical heterogeneity of advSM is most likely because of the presence and dynamic evolution of several molecularly disparate subclones, which have a variable impact on clinical characteristics and response to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%