2017
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-764423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response and progression on midostaurin in advanced systemic mastocytosis: KIT D816V and other molecular markers

Abstract: Key Points• The complexity and dynamics of mutations significantly impact on response, progression, and prognosis in midostaurintreated advSM patients.In advanced systemic mastocytosis (advSM), disease evolution is often triggered by KIT mutations (D816V in >80% of cases) and by additional mutations (eg, in SRSF2, ASXL1, and/or RUNX1 [S/A/R pos in >60% of cases]). In a recently reported phase 2 study, midostaurin, a multikinase/KIT inhibitor, demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 60% in advSM but biom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
94
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(56 reference statements)
4
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, ASXL1 , RUNX1 and SRSF2 mutations that are frequently observed in other myeloid malignancies have been identified as being prognostically detrimental, particularly in advanced SM patients . Further, one study showed inferior clinical outcomes (ie, response rates, survival and disease progression) in advanced SM patients receiving midostaurin treatment, for those harboring poor‐risk mutations as compared to those without such mutations . In a recent study, two complementary risk models for SM were developed, referred to as the Mayo Alliance Prognostic System (MAPS) for SM; one model (clinical) was based on clinical variables alone while the other (hybrid clinical‐molecular) included adverse mutations as an independent risk factor .…”
Section: Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, ASXL1 , RUNX1 and SRSF2 mutations that are frequently observed in other myeloid malignancies have been identified as being prognostically detrimental, particularly in advanced SM patients . Further, one study showed inferior clinical outcomes (ie, response rates, survival and disease progression) in advanced SM patients receiving midostaurin treatment, for those harboring poor‐risk mutations as compared to those without such mutations . In a recent study, two complementary risk models for SM were developed, referred to as the Mayo Alliance Prognostic System (MAPS) for SM; one model (clinical) was based on clinical variables alone while the other (hybrid clinical‐molecular) included adverse mutations as an independent risk factor .…”
Section: Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 KIT D816V iPSCderived cells were also targeted by midostaurin, avapritinib (BLU-285) and ripretinib (DCC-2618), in agreement with previous reports and clinical trials for these compounds. 17,[19][20][21] Importantly, nintedanib compromised cell viability of SM patient samples and blocked KIT D816V phosphorylation and signaling in primary patient cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…11,15 Other TKIs, such as midostaurin, suppress the growth of KIT D816V neoplastic MCs and recently, midostaurin was approved for treatment of advanced SM. [16][17][18] More recently, two further compounds targeting KIT D816V, ripretinib (DCC-2618) and avapritinib (BLU-285), were identified and are being tested in clinical trials for advanced SM. [19][20][21] However, none of the available drugs can induce complete long-lasting remission in all patients and therefore, further efforts to establish preclinical models and to identify new TKIs are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common adverse effects are neutropenia or persistent lymphopenia. The majority of patients with ASM or MCL respond to midostaurin, a kinase inhibitor available for oral use . The response is usually only temporary, though.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%