2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2063-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted Formation of 8-Oxoguanine in Telomeres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, relative cell counts 4 days after 20 min of DL exposure showed a partial rescue of 8oxoG-induced growth reduction in single KO cells, and a near complete rescue in DKO cells, while all cell lines were unaffected by dye or light alone (Figure 1C). Increasing the DL exposure from 5 to 20 min amplified the differential response of glycosylase deficient and WT cells to telomeric damage (Figure S1A), consistent with greater 8oxoG production with longer exposures 33 . Simultaneous treatment with 20 min DL and the OGG1 inhibitor TH5487 (OGG1i), which prevents OGG1 binding 35 , also partially rescued the cell growth reduction in WT cells, similar to OGG1 KO, whereas a close structural analog (OGG1i NA ) had no effect (Figure S1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, relative cell counts 4 days after 20 min of DL exposure showed a partial rescue of 8oxoG-induced growth reduction in single KO cells, and a near complete rescue in DKO cells, while all cell lines were unaffected by dye or light alone (Figure 1C). Increasing the DL exposure from 5 to 20 min amplified the differential response of glycosylase deficient and WT cells to telomeric damage (Figure S1A), consistent with greater 8oxoG production with longer exposures 33 . Simultaneous treatment with 20 min DL and the OGG1 inhibitor TH5487 (OGG1i), which prevents OGG1 binding 35 , also partially rescued the cell growth reduction in WT cells, similar to OGG1 KO, whereas a close structural analog (OGG1i NA ) had no effect (Figure S1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…To study how oxidative damage impacts telomere function, we use a chemoptogenetic tool that generates 8oxoG by directing localized production of highly reactive singlet oxygen ( 1 O2) at telomeres 15 . Photosensitizer di-iodinated malachite green (MG2I) dye (D) produces 1 O2 when bound to a fluorogen activating peptide (FAP) fused with telomeric protein TRF1, and then activated with 660 nm light (L) 33,34 . We previously demonstrated that acute production of telomeric 8oxoG in non-diseased human BJ hTERT fibroblasts (BJ FAP-TRF1) increased senescent cells just 4 days after dye and light (DL) exposure 16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that the increased sensitivity of U2OS FAP cells was not due to greater amounts of induced damage, we conducted the 8oxoG detection assay, in which FPG glycosylase and S1 nuclease convert 8oxoG lesions to DSBs in telomere restriction fragments. 53 Since both cell lines showed comparable amounts of cleaved telomere fragments after dye and light exposure in this assay ( Figures S3A and S3B ), we concluded that 8oxoG is more likely to induce replication stress at ALT telomeres compared to telomeres in Tel+ cancer cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“… 26 While 8oxoG imparts little to no distortion of the DNA helix and is far less disruptive to chromosome structure than a DSB, it is an abundant source of endogenous DNA damage, especially in telomeric sequences. 40 To examine whether oxidative damage impacts ALT-HDR, we used the FAP-TRF1 system to specifically generate 8oxoG at telomeres 53 and assayed for hallmarks of ALT activity. For this, we generated ALT+ cell lines that stably express FAP-mCerulean-TRF1 (termed FAP cells).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] Absence of sufficient telomere bases at chromosome ends in the cells defective in ATM protein can cause the chromosomes to fuse and result in dicentrics and complex chromosomal translocations. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that oxidative stress reportedly accelerates telomere attrition [43][44][45][46] by inhibiting telomerase and disrupting the recognition by telomere-binding proteins which contributes to telomere uncapping. [43,46,47] This substantiates that telomeric DNA may be hypersensitive to oxidative DNA damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%