W hy do some older people die in the face of heatwaves and others do not? What has created the heightened risk of mortality from COVID-19 in older people? This vulnerability comes in part from the effects of chronic diseases and other health-related conditions that accumulate with increasing age. We hypothesize that it also results from what clinicians term 'frailty' , a state of depleted reserve resulting in increased vulnerability to stressors that emerges during aging independently of any specific disease. Definitions of frailty are abound. The two dominantly used are 'phenotypic frailty' , where a validated clinical presentation marks a distinct clinical syndrome and pathophysiology 1,2 , and a 'deficit accumulation model' frailty index, which summarizes the presence of multiple clinically identified diseases, their clinical and laboratory manifestations and consequences, and risk factors into a composite index for risk prediction 3,4. These two distinct conceptualizations both carry the same nomenclature and both predict high mortality and institutionalization risk, but they denote different theory, etiologies, measures and possibly processes, and identify considerably different populations and different targets of intervention 5. Other definitions of frailty have integrated additional constructs, particularly cognitive frailty, as proposed by the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics/International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IAGG/IANA) 6,7. However, such integration has the potential to obscure meaningful differences, as exemplified by the observation that 22% of people with Alzheimer's disease had no physical indicators of frailty 8. This is reinforced by clinical encounters with older adults who are physically robust but cognitively frail and vice versa. Accordingly, we view other types of frailty, whether they are cognitive, emotional or psychosocial frailty, as important but distinct constructs that can be most fruitfully measured separately from each other and from phenotypic frailty. Both phenotypically identified frailty and the frailty index, finally, also link to other constructs in gerontology, notably, 'allostasis' , 'homeostasis' , 'robustness' , 'reserve' and 'resilience'. A thorough disambiguation of these related concepts is beyond our scope, but provisional definitions are given in Box 1 and considered below. The syndrome of phenotypic frailty-henceforth termed 'physical frailty'-is the focus of this Perspective. Clinical presentation of the phenotype denotes a distinctive high-risk clinical state that indicates decreased reserves and high vulnerability to stressors. The state is clinically recognizable through the presence of three or more of five key clinical signs and symptoms: weakness, slow walking speed, low physical activity, fatigue or exhaustion, and unintentional weight loss (Fig. 1 and Box 1) 1,2. Prevalence in people 65 years and older varies across populations, with a predominant rate of 7-10% in community-dwelling older adults, which increases to over 25% ...