2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target trapping and in situ single-cell genetic marker detection with a focused optical beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
Fig. 4 Other cell trapping methods based on different physical fields: A DEP-based single cell trapping (Qin et al 2018 ), B optical tweezer-based single cell trapping (Cong et al 2019 ), C magnetic-based single cell trapping (Shields et al 2016 )
…”
Section: Single-cell Nucleic Acid Analysis Based On Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
Fig. 4 Other cell trapping methods based on different physical fields: A DEP-based single cell trapping (Qin et al 2018 ), B optical tweezer-based single cell trapping (Cong et al 2019 ), C magnetic-based single cell trapping (Shields et al 2016 )
…”
Section: Single-cell Nucleic Acid Analysis Based On Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This platform can achieve selective capture of single cells with light beams (Huang et al 2013 ). For increasing the range of optical trapping, Cong et al ( 2019 ) made a focused optical beam trap by combining optical forces and convective drag forces to guide living single cancer cell into a microwell array for multidrug-resistant gene marker detection (Fig. 4 B).…”
Section: Single-cell Nucleic Acid Analysis Based On Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the undulatory property of light 30 , the finite difference time domain(FDTD) method and "COMSOL" are operated to simulate the thermal energy of highly focused beam 31,32 and fluidity of liquid samples respectively 33 . The reason is that under the laser irradiation, the radiation pressure may heat the liquid solution 34,35 , affecting the laminar flow in the chamber 36 . Due to the loss of laser in the optical path, the final power of single optical trap is less than 600 mW in the sample chamber.…”
Section: Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optothermal microfluidic techniques have had a significant impact on physiological and clinical use in recent years. The optothermal microfluidic has enabled living cell trapping and manipulations, where plasmonic heat‐induced natural convection and thermophoresis provides a larger manipulation range . Because of its unique properties of remote control and ultrafast on‐demand nanoscale thermal production, it has also been widely employed in biosensing and manipulation of cellular functions, such as ultrafast plasmonic PCR, intracellular gene delivery and release, as well as single‐cell neural activity control …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%