2001
DOI: 10.1207/s15327965pli1203_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TARGET ARTICLE: Limitations to Free Association and Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not explicitly discussed in her paper, Pearson's methodology has links to the psychoanalytical technique of free association as discussed by Macmillan (2001). Freud proposed that when given a cue, but no further influence or direction, the client's initial unmediated responses to that clue were representative of unconscious thoughts that were internally associated with the initial cue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although not explicitly discussed in her paper, Pearson's methodology has links to the psychoanalytical technique of free association as discussed by Macmillan (2001). Freud proposed that when given a cue, but no further influence or direction, the client's initial unmediated responses to that clue were representative of unconscious thoughts that were internally associated with the initial cue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key strength of the technique in this study is that it allows us to get somewhere beyond the considered response, such as may be obtained via a questionnaire. The problem with the considered response is that it may, as Macmillan (2001) discusses, allow the respondents to say what is it that they think they should say. With the free association technique the aim is to get a truer reflection of the underlying values and attitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite tremendous research efforts, the psychology community is polarized regarding the validity of this concept. On the one hand, in line with harsh criticism against psychoanalysis in general (e.g., Crews, 1998;Gross, 1978;Grü nbaum, 1984Grü nbaum, , 1998Grü nbaum, , 2002Macmillan, 1997Macmillan, , 2001, numerous investigators question the validity of repression, claiming that it needs to be abandoned (e.g., Bonanno & Keuler, 1998;Court & Court, 2001;Pendergrast, 1997;Piper, Pope, & Borowiecki, 2000; H. G. Pope, Oliva, & Hudson, 1999). On the other hand, psychoanalysis continues to be one of the central theories of psychopathology, and many investigators believe that repression is a valid concept (e.g., Bowers & Farvolden, 1996;Brown, Scheflin, & Whitfield, 1999;Cheit, 1998;Eagle, 2000aEagle, , 2000bTalvitie & Ihanus, 2003;Westen, 1998aWesten, , 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Bernard and Goodyear (2009) postulated that CIT anxiety within groups led to reduced participation and self-disclosure. Working with a CIT's anxiety, particularly in the beginning stages of supervision, acknowledging when it could be channeled to increase determination, learning, (Christenson & Kline, 2000, 2001) and simply normalizing its existence (Fleming et al, 2010) can foster increased participation, selfdisclosure, and group cohesiveness.…”
Section: Clinical Group Supervision Processes and Self-disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%