PsycEXTRA Dataset 2012
DOI: 10.1037/e526372013-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TANF Recipients with Barriers to Employment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…State governments have significant control of aspects of TANF including, for example, work requirements, work waivers for survivors of domestic violence, eligibility criteria, and time limits (Bloom, Loprest, & Zedlewski, 2011; Huber, Cohen, Briggs, & Kassabian, 2015). There is variation even within states; Colorado and California allow policies to vary between counties.…”
Section: State Level Variations In Economic Security Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…State governments have significant control of aspects of TANF including, for example, work requirements, work waivers for survivors of domestic violence, eligibility criteria, and time limits (Bloom, Loprest, & Zedlewski, 2011; Huber, Cohen, Briggs, & Kassabian, 2015). There is variation even within states; Colorado and California allow policies to vary between counties.…”
Section: State Level Variations In Economic Security Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a family of three, the maximum cash benefit ranges from $204 in Arkansas to $1628 in Virginia (Huber et al, 2015). TANF recipients, especially those considered “hard to employ,” (e.g., individuals with disabilities, criminal backgrounds, limited education, or experience with domestic violence) also have varying access to employment, case management, and training programs depending on their location (Bloom et al, 2011). …”
Section: State Level Variations In Economic Security Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have suggested that childhood abuse is an important factor for future education and earnings potential because of its strong relationship to decreased mental health that, in turn, translates into reduced educational attainment, weaker workforce attachment, lower wages, and increased work difficulties (Robst, 2010;Robst & Smith, 2008). Among low-income populations, studies have found that mental health issues consistently rank among the top barriers to employment (Bloom, Loprest, & Zedlewski, 2012), women accessing public assistance are significantly more likely to be depressed as compared to the general population (Jayakody, Danziger, & Pollack, 2000), and women with any type of mental illness experience a 25% reduced likelihood of obtaining employment (Jayakody & Stauffer, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families program [TANF] program (Aratani et al, 2014;Banerjee & Damman, 2013;Bitler et al, 2014;Bloom, Loprest, & Zedlewski, 2011;Rodgers & Tedin, 2006;Sheely, 2012;Siegel, Green, Abbott, Mogul, & Patacsil, 2004). A similar trend is followed with studies related to the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and…”
Section: Toward Concurrent Program Participationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Chamlin et al's (2007) findings can also be interpreted in light of potential barriers to employment faced by TANF recipients. These include disabilities, low education, age, physical and mental illness, lack of transportation, lack of affordable childcare (Banerjee & Damman, 2013;Bloom et al, 2011;Danziger & Seefeldt, 2003;Dworsky & Courtney, 2007;Pavetti, 2002;Sandstrom, Seefeldt, Huerta, & Loprest, 2014;Siegel et al, 2004). Finally, the small sample involved in the Wisconsin experiment does not allow generalization of findings to the entire U. S. population.…”
Section: Theses Of Welfare Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%