1986
DOI: 10.2307/132445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tanaka Kakuei, Structural Corruption, and the Advent of Machine Politics in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has been argued that Takeshita's influence was in fact greater after his resignation as prime minister and the selection of each of his successors with the exceptions of Hosokawa and Hata reflect this influence up until his death in 2000 (Anon 1999). Moreover, there has been much discussion of the case of Tanaka and his influence over subsequent administrations can be neatly captured in the term "Tanakasone" that was used to describe Nakasone's administration (Johnson 1986;Babb 2000;Nihon Keizai Shinbun, May 26, 1983).…”
Section: Former Prime Ministers In Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been argued that Takeshita's influence was in fact greater after his resignation as prime minister and the selection of each of his successors with the exceptions of Hosokawa and Hata reflect this influence up until his death in 2000 (Anon 1999). Moreover, there has been much discussion of the case of Tanaka and his influence over subsequent administrations can be neatly captured in the term "Tanakasone" that was used to describe Nakasone's administration (Johnson 1986;Babb 2000;Nihon Keizai Shinbun, May 26, 1983).…”
Section: Former Prime Ministers In Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-28), and thus each of the scenarios requires a word of explanation. 4 While none of the four involves conduct that is unambiguously illegal under current Japanese law, all concern behavior on the part of Japanese politicians or bureaucrats that is fairly common and is subject to considerable media coverage, debate, and various regulatory initiatives (Johnson, 1986;MacDougall, 1988;Mitchell, 1996;Murobushi, 1988;Reed, 1996;Schlesinger, 1997). Each scenario arises in the context of the usual customs and practices among ordinary people in Japan-such as presenting substantial monetary gifts (often in the $200 to $1,000 range, depending on the status, income, and relationship of the respective parties) to the bereaved family at funerals, or distributing sometimes quite costly gifts to associates when returning from a trip-that may sound unfamiliar to Western readers.…”
Section: Stock Dealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scholars commonly attribute his long-standing dominance in Niigata Prefecture to his pork-barrel projects (Babb 2000;Johnson 1986), locals admire him as a man who pulled Niigata-a prefecture in the socially inferior "Ura-nippon" (backside Japan), the area neglected by the "developmental" state of Japan (Lewis 2000, 10, 56-58)-from its perennial backwardness. Although scholars commonly attribute his long-standing dominance in Niigata Prefecture to his pork-barrel projects (Babb 2000;Johnson 1986), locals admire him as a man who pulled Niigata-a prefecture in the socially inferior "Ura-nippon" (backside Japan), the area neglected by the "developmental" state of Japan (Lewis 2000, 10, 56-58)-from its perennial backwardness.…”
Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%